maori Archives - Page 5 of 9 -

4Jul2025

A TOXIC INFLUENCE IN NEW ZEALAND SCHOOLS

July 4, 2025

culture, education, indoctrination, iwi, maori, New Zealand Education

New Zealand schools are compelled to “consult with iwi”. This involves “undertaking and respecting iwi’s perspectives on education, cultural values and aspirations for their children. Consultation should be ongoing and genuine, with schools ACTIVELY seeking input from iwi on curriculum, school activities and any initiatives that impact [part] Maori students”. (The term “part-Maori” is used since “Maori” are extinct, having bred themselves out of existence by preferring to breed with Europeans).

The above requirement is racist, laughable and very damaging to the education of New Zealand school students. It is racist because it singles out one of New Zealand’s several minority race groups, part-Maoris, but no others. It is laughable to ask for “iwi’s perspectives on education” and to ACTIVELY seek “input from iwi on curriculum” because the part-Maoris on these iwi committees, who are being asked for this input, are the very worst group of New Zealanders to give such advice since part-Maoris are at the very bottom of every educational statistic, topping the statistics for truancy but being consistently at the bottom of educational achievement.

Instead of dealing with the very real problem of truancy and poor literacy among part-Maoris, these iwi consultative groups are in the business of a cultural crusade against Western values, Western education and even nomenclature. They are like cultural doorkeepers, forcing changes to any notice or sign in the school that is in English only, weeding out any books from the school library that mention cannibalism or any of the other ugly traditional Maori practices, and even using their clout to change the name of any school that offend the prejudices of the tribal elite. Their contribution to the sound education of the general body of students in precisely zero, which is why a tried and tested discipline like Latin has been expunged while the new, largely made-up, Esperanto type “te reo” is given an almost godly status even though in the 21st century it is all but useless. Learning French or Mandarin would be far more use to students – both “part-Maori” and non-Maori.

A recent outrage of these cultural warriors has been to change the name of James Cook High School in Manurewa, Auckland. The school was founded in 1968 on the eve of the Bicentenary of Captain Cook’s great First Voyage of discovery in the Endeavour. It was on this voyage that he mapped New Zealand and made it known to the world. This was the first step in bringing the Stone Age tribes of New Zealand into the safety, freedom, peace, comfort and prosperity of the modern world and away from their centuries of self-destructive tribal wars and cannibalism.

For 57 years this school has built up a name for itself and a culture that has been a source of pride to its students. Its motto is “Endeavour” – a nod to Cook and a suitable word to encourage the students. However, it has recently got up the nose of the local iwi who have forced their will on to the school and compelled it to change its name to the unpronounceable and meaningless “Te Haikura a Kiwa”. No, I am not making this up. You have Auckland Grammar, Kings, Rangitoto College – and now something with four words that nobody understands either now or in the future.

The principal, Tina Filipe, is either too gutless to stand up against this act of cultural vandalism, destroying 57 years of a built-up tradition, or – even worse – she is a collaborator in this act of cultural destruction. In either event it would appear that she is quite unfit to be running a secondary school.

On her watch this school has a low Equity Index of 532, “placing it amongst schools whose students have the most socioeconomic barriers to achievement (roughly equivalent to deciles 1 and 2 under the previous system)”. In other words, its educational achievement is one of the lowest in the country.

One would have thought that the principal of such a school would devote all of her time and effort into lifting the educational standards of this failing school instead of playing race politics and denigrating our wonderful Western heritage by going to all the trouble of changing the name of a school after it has been going for more than half a century under the name of James Cook High School. Of course, by going down the name-changing path, Tina Filipe will be diverting attention towards an extraneous matter and away from the appalling educational standards of the school that she is meant to be running. That may well be the whole point of the exercise. What sort of parents would condemn their children to be educated at such a school?

28Jun2025

ETHNICITY ANOMALIES

June 28, 2025

admin

ethnicity, maori, race, waitangi claims Maori, Treaty of Waitangi, Treaty Settlements

By Rob Paterson

Many people are making valid protests about Waitangi claimants with very slight Maori bloodlines (ethnicity) and are looking for a formula on how to address this anomaly. Well here’s the solution; it’s called the Ethnicity Equalisation Scheme (EES).

For openers, we must address the quixotic definition of Maori in S.2 Maori Affairs Amendment Act 1974 which most sensible people consider to be farcical because this legal fiction seeks to create a statutory Maori race. If claimants are going to use any level of Maori ethnicity for Waitangi claims etc., then a scheme should be required to have authenticated certified documents to ensure whakapapas are accurate, with Birth Certificates, Driver’s Licences and Passports, etc. endorsed, showing the degree of ethnicity attributed to claimants and this must be the minimum prerequisite requirement for obtaining any payments from Waitangi claims, etc. In addition, DNA testing would be mandatory.

All this evidence to be actioned at the cost of the claimant.

It follows that when looking at a tribe of say 2,000 ‘members’, there must be supporting documentation and evidence for each and every tribal member with lists made available for public inspection and then the ethnicity of the whole tribe must be averaged out.

In a worked example, should the perceived grievance claim or any other claim (hard to take seriously) for some reason be successful and for example assessed at say $32 million, then if the average Maori ethnicity of the tribe is 1/8^th,, the payment out would be only $4 million and the $28 million balance would be withheld along the same lines as the ‘contributory negligence doctrine’ to the extent of 7/8^th representing the ethnicity percentage other than Maori and these funds should be returned to the NZ taxpayer via the Government, i.e, not paid out.

That would be a fair and equitable outcome because taxpayers are entitled to know that all those who are claiming to be statutory Maori are really what they claim to be. They must provide accurate documentary proof because word of mouth mumbo jumbo is not good enough. If part-Maori don’t want such endorsement as to their ethnicity, they need not apply. The choice is theirs. Current assessments indicate that no one can claim to have 50% Maori ethnicity; therefore the so-called Maori race exists only by statute that can be revoked by a 51% vote in Parliament. Other than by virtue of the statutory definition everyone in New Zealand must therefore currently be classified as non- Maori.

23Jun2025

AN AUDITOR-GENERAL WHO CANNOT ADD UP!!!!!

June 23, 2025

admin

billions of dollars, crown, iwi, maori, treaty settlements Maori, Treaty of Waitangi, Treaty Settlements

The appointment of John Ryan as Auditor-General by the then Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, seems to have been a case of “Woke” freemasonry. During his term of office he took it upon himself to get involved in Treaty matters, about which he seems to know very little beyond the usual soundbites of “partnership” and “principles” even though the Treaty of Waitangi was not a partnership and, like all treaties, does not have any principles – just the black and white words of the document.

In his capacity as Auditor-General John Ryan stated on 10^th April, 2025, “To date, $2.738 billion of financial and commercial redress has been transferred through [Treaty] settlements”. This is a TOTALLY FALSE statement as the correct amount that has been transferred from the taxpayer to the ever grasping tribes up to 2022 is $4.269 billion (see Table below as compiled by Mike Butler).

So why did Ryan declare a much smaller figure? Was it to try to put one across the public by deluding them that the amount that has been swiped off the taxpayer is not as large as it really is or is it that this highly paid “Auditor-General” just can’t add up? In either event he was obviously quite unfit for the position he held. His term of office, after six years of Wokery and/or apparent innumeracy, ended in June, 2025, and for the people of New Zealand – especially the taxpayers – it was a case of “Good riddance”.

In May, 2025, Ryan made a further “boob” when he declared that, since 1840, the Crown “has not met its obligations” under the Treaty. Not so, for as Doctor John Robinson pointed out in his book, “Who Really Broke The Treaty?”, the Crown never broke the Treaty; the only obligation that the Treaty imposed on the Crown was to govern the country – which it has done ever since. Nothing more. And certainly no “principles” or “partnership”, which are the false foundations of the modern Treaty industry. In John Robinson’s words, “Since Treaty settlements are based on the incorrect assumption that the Crown broke the Treaty, demanding compensation for such presumed wrongdoing, all such settlements are a fraud”.

You may download a copy of this list and share with anyone you think might be interested. You can find a downloadable pdf here.