CHRISTOPHER LUXON – Enemy of New Zealand?

August 16, 2026
, , , , , Maori, New Zealand Government, NZ Parliament, The National Party

By John McLean

Christopher Luxon might be a bit short on governing skills but when it comes to selfishness and lack of patriotism he seems to be right up there at the top – as shown by his reaction to not one but two challenges to his ineffectual leadership by National M.P.s in the last few months. A more honest and patriotic man would look beyond his own egotism and selfishness by considering the good of both the National Party and New Zealand. Since he became Prime Minister he has shown both his incompetence and his nastiness on several occasions.

When he was Leader of the Opposition the 1Law4All organisation printed a booklet entitled “Are We Being Conned By The Treaty Industry?”. It called for One Law For All New Zealanders and no special race-based legal privileges for those who are one-eighth or one-sixteenth (or whatever) Maori.

This was seen by the tribal elite as a threat to their ever growing power and so they kicked up a stir in the media. When asked about the booklet Luxon, in order to ingratiate himself with the Left wing media, damned it as “racist”. What? For advocating the same laws for everybody!!!!!! This was a straight out lie as nothing in the booklet was (or is) racist.

This instance of deceit and nastiness is not untypical of the man. As part of the Coalition agreement with ACT National was committed to supporting David Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill to its First Reading. After that, National would have the right to make up its own mind and, by our constitutional practice, that might have been expected to be after the hearing of public Submissions, which took place between the First Reading of the Bill and its Second Reading.

However, at the Waitangi circus in February, 2025, Luxon was “got at” by the thugs of the tribal elite and so immediately after returning from Waitangi he announced that National would not support the Bill at its Second Reading. By refusing to wait for what might have come out of the public Submissions to the Bill, he showed that cowardice is yet another one of his unpleasant characteristics.

In order to ingratiate himself further with the tribal elite and other enemies of a New Zealand where we would all have the same legal rights, Luxon said that there was “nothing at all” that he liked about this Bill – a Bill that was motivated by the noble and democratic principle of One Law For All, and that he ruled out the inclusion of such a measure in any future Coalition arrangements with ACT and NZ First. He hates the idea of all New Zealanders having equal rights and deserves in return the contempt of all New Zealanders who value democracy and equality.

It doesn’t take too many brains to realise that Luxon is leading the National Party to likely defeat in November. As that wise old owl, Peter Williams, recently stated on RCR, “The National Party is a shambles with a leader and senior M.P.s whose egos matter more than the good of the country.”

This downward path could have been rectified at either of the two recent leadership challenges but for Luxon’s selfishness in refusing to resign. He has no concern for the future of the country – just for his own personal position.

The thing is bigger than him or even the National Party itself as a Labour led government of Greens, TOP, and the Maori Party would be a fate worse than death. Little Hipkins wouldn’t last long as the neo-Marxist, Kieran McAnulty, appears to be just waiting in the wings to stick the knife into his leader’s back so that he and his fellow Marxist sympathisers would have carte blanche to steal our property and our rights and to undermine the economy. Just like Grant Robertson, Ardern and little Hipkins did in the last Labour government by so recklessly increasing borrowing to such heights that it is unlikely ever to be repaid, the interest becoming more and more a burden for future generations.

Luxon lacks a spine and the only times that his government has shown any courage have been when Winston Peters and David Seymour have provided the spine that otherwise would have been lacking. It is time for this utterly inadequate Prime Minister to put his country ahead of himself for a change. All he has to do is drive to Government House and tender his resignation. I am sure that there are thousands of people who would volunteer to be the chauffeur.

THE ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL ANCHOR; FORMAL NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

June 16, 2026
, , , , Maori, New Zealand Government, Treaty of Waitangi, Treaty Settlements

By Ivan Barnett

This document requires immediate and serious attention from ACT, NZ First, and National MPs.

It is not a partisan argument. It is a constitutional warning.

New Zealand is experiencing constitutional drift driven by: undefined Treaty terms, judicial reinterpretation, bureaucratic expansion, non‑statutory governance structures, opaque Crown–iwi negotiations, public funding of private entities without accountability.

These developments are occurring without public mandate, without statutory authority, and without democratic legitimacy.

Failure to address these issues will result in the continued erosion of parliamentary sovereignty and the entrenchment of unelected authority structures.

I. THE TREATY TEXT: THE ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL ANCHOR

The Māori‑language Treaty — the only version actually agreed to — contains:

kāwanatanga ceded to the Crown,

tino rangatiratanga guaranteed to individuals and hapū over their property,

nga tikanga katoa rite tahi — equal rights under the law.

It contains no partnership, no co‑governance, no shared sovereignty, no “principles,” and no requirement to “give effect to” anything.

The English text was not agreed to.

The “principles” doctrine was invented more than a century later.

The partnership doctrine has no basis in the text.

The Māori text is the constitutional foundation.

II. JUDICIAL REINTERPRETATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RISK

The courts have expanded Treaty obligations far beyond the text, creating:

Partnership, active protection, shared authority, co‑governance, obligations to “give effect to”, obligations to protect “taonga” in an expanded sense. These expansions were not authorized by Parliament. They were not authorized by the Treaty.

They were created through judicial interpretation, often relying on the English text or later political developments.

This has created a parallel constitutional framework that Parliament never enacted.

III. THE LEGAL EXPANSION OF “TAONGA”

A. The 1840 Meaning

In the Māori text, taonga meant:

Property, goods, possessions, tangible items.

It did not include: political authority, natural resources, data, language, environmental governance, cultural veto rights.

The modern expansion is a post‑1980s invention.

B. Case Law Driving Expansion

NZMC v AG (1987)

Expanded “taonga” to intangible cultural values.

Broadcasting Assets (1994)

Declared Māori language a “taonga” requiring Crown protection.

Ngāi Tahu v DG of Conservation (1995)

Extended “taonga” into commercial regulation.

Ngāti Apa (2003)

Extended “taonga” into territorial authority.

None of these expansions are grounded in the Māori text.

C. Tribunal Jurisprudence

The Waitangi Tribunal has extended “taonga” into: flora and fauna (Wai 262)

intellectual property, genetic material, scientific knowledge, data sovereignty (Wai 2522)

political authority (Wai 1040)

These findings are advisory, yet government agencies treat them as binding.

D. Constitutional Consequences

Judicial policymaking replaces parliamentary lawmaking. Undefined Treaty terms override statutory clarity, Sector‑wide co‑governance claims proliferate, Equal citizenship is eroded. Parliamentary sovereignty is weakened.

IV. NON‑STATUTORY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES

A. National Iwi Chairs Forum (NICF)

Not created by statute.

Not elected. Not accountable. Not subject to OIA.

Yet Ministers attend its meetings and treat it as a parallel policy body.

B. Iwi Leaders Groups (ILGs)

Operate in: Freshwater, climate, resource management, health, data.

They draft policy frameworks and negotiate directly with government agencies.

C. Data Iwi Leaders Group (DILG)

Claims Māori data is a “taonga” requiring Māori governance.

Influences: Cloud First, AI governance, national data policy. This is policy capture by a private entity.

D. Funding and Accountability

These bodies receive taxpayer‑funded support through: departmental budgets, consultancy contracts, engagement payments, co‑governance participation funding, local government contributions.

Yet they remain: unaudited, unregulated, unaccountable, opaque. This is incompatible with democratic governance.

V. CONSTITUTIONAL RISKS TO NEW ZEALAND

Parallel authority structures. Loss of democratic accountability, Opaque decision‑making, Erosion of equal citizenship. Undermining of parliamentary sovereignty, Judicial expansion without democratic mandate. Policy capture by unelected entities, These risks are not hypothetical.

They are already occurring.

VI. REQUIRED ACTION BY PARLIAMENT

To restore constitutional clarity and democratic accountability, Parliament must:

1. Define “taonga” explicitly and narrowly

— as property and possessions in the 1840 sense.

2. Anchor Treaty interpretation in the Māori text

— not in judicially‑invented “principles.”

3. Affirm that NICF, ILGs, and DILG have no constitutional or statutory authority

— and cannot bind the Crown.

4. Require transparency in all Crown–iwi negotiations

— including OIA coverage.

5. Reassert parliamentary sovereignty

— only Parliament can make law.

6. Ensure equal citizenship under Article 3

— no parallel governance structures.

VII. RED LINE DECLARATION

No constitutional authority may be transferred, shared, or implied through: undefined Treaty terms, judicial invention, bureaucratic policy, non‑statutory negotiation, co‑governance arrangements ,partnership doctrines.

Tribunal findings. Only Parliament may legislate. Only the Māori text of Te Tiriti is binding.

Equal citizenship is non‑negotiable.

VIII. CLOSING CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT

This document is submitted to ACT, NZ First, and National with the expectation that it will be treated with the seriousness required of elected representatives. This is not a political dispute.

It is a constitutional inflection point. If Parliament fails to act: constitutional drift will continue, democratic accountability will erode, parallel authority structures will deepen, public trust will collapse.

The responsibility now rests with Parliament.

The public expects clarity, courage, and constitutional integrity.

This document has been compiled from a wide range of files, reports, and reference materials. It is provided to Members of Parliament for serious consideration. The content requires further research, careful evaluation, and informed discussion to ensure that the constitutional issues identified are properly understood and addressed

The Greatest Scam in The History of NZ

June 11, 2026
, , , , Democracy, He Puapua, Maori, NZ Local Government, Treaty of Waitangi

By William Chambers

There are hundreds of preferential “provisions” along with 96 Acts of Parliament favouring Maori over all other New Zealanders.  So, you must surely be asking yourself how fair is that, … and WHY would such a blatant apartheid regime have ever been allowed to come about.

Well, this country has been taken down by the biggest fraudulent scam ever known.  Due entirely to the fact that Activists are inherently greedy.

And due also to the fact that many Politicians are inherently unscrupulous.  So, the desire for power is what causes them to betray the rights of the majority.  While at the same time, allowing our country’s democracy to be destroyed.

The entire shameful rort is based firstly on the ever-expanding acceptance of Maori being INDIGENOUS to New Zealand.  Which is most definitely not true.  (As a result of the Key government signing and Mr. Luxon “affirming” the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Maori could have the right to separate self-rule … through their own political and legal systems.  And also separate education, health, and housing (all funded by the State) with entitlement to much of NZ’s land; and all key natural resources from which income is derived.  And including the push for intellectual “rights” on property, genetics, and all living species in the country – both native and introduced.)

Then, whilst Article 1. of the Treaty is clearly about the Maori Chiefs ceding SOVEREIGNTY to the British Crown, Activists have misinterpreted it as meaning they did not.  This is a straight out lie – part of the trickery to assert self-determination, with all the riches that scenario would entail.

And where in Article 2. Maori are guaranteed ownership of their lands, there is the additional word “PROPERTY” which was referring to precious treasures (taonga) i.e. personal possessions obtained by the tip of the spear. This limited description has now been deviously misconstrued as meaning underground minerals, iron sands, plant life, wildlife, water, and even the sky (airwaves).  So, the sky’s the limit as far as their claims go.  You name it, they’ll claim it … if there is easy money to be gained.

Then in Article 3. the focus is on EQUALITY which simply and concisely reads: “A ratou nga tikanga katoa rite tahi”.  Meaning: All New Zealanders are equal under the law with the same rights and privileges.

However, fraudsters have twisted that as meaning Maori are meant to have “equitable” outcomes.  And by that, they mean doing as well in life as the rest of us, without too much effort on their part.  So, once again, with the emphasis on easy money.

Aside from all that, there’s the claim that the Treaty is a “PARTNERSHIP”.  Professor Elizabeth Rata has said, quote: “An invented reinterpretation of the Treaty as a ‘partnership’ has been taught to at least two generations of schoolchildren.”

Such forced indoctrination of our children is scandalous.  Nowhere is there even a hint of “partnership” in any version of the Treaty.

Then we have the ludicrous Treaty “PRINCIPLES”.  There are absolutely none in the ‘Agreement’.  They were dreamed up more than a century later.  And due to being “illusionary” were not defined … so, can mean whatever Maori want them to be.  Open slather.

Another part of the scam that we’ve succumbed to, is the claim of rights to “FISHERIES” because a bogus English version of the Treaty wrongly includes that word.

The fact is, the correct “Mother” Draft used for translating into Maori was misplaced until found in 1989 – and it does not mention “fisheries”.  Which of course, explains why the word “fisheries” is not in the Treaty written in Te Reo.

But, Maori choose to ignore what is the “official” treaty Document, in favour of the false English version, because it means they‘re able to claim exclusive harvesting rights.  And, have been granted huge tonnages of quota.  Plus, been gifted major shareholdings in New Zealand fishing Companies.  Thus, yet another rort.

Aside from fisheries, the word “FORESTS” was also wrongly included in the bogus English copy of the Treaty.

Whereas, that word is not in the genuine Draft … which likewise, explains why “Forests” is not in the Te Reo Treaty Document either.

Yet, it is now deviously being taken as meaning Maori should be handed the ownership of our entire DoC Estate!  Hence, another example of an ongoing attempt at takeover of what they have no legitimate “right” to.

CONCLUSION:  

A lot of people still won’t want to accept that so many aspects have been twisted to advantage Maori.  They’ll be asking how fraud of such magnitude could possibly have been enabled to occur.

Well, after the Activists’ first victorious scam in the 1970’s was accepted by unscrupulous Politicians, mercenary Lawyers, hero Judges, woke University Professors, PC Historians, despising bureaucrats, and biased Media … the Radicals soon learnt that it’s easy to get what they want by devious manipulation.

And the best bit is that those who’ve been conned, imagine they came up with it themselves, out of misguided consideration, and in unwarranted fairness to a Race of people who have been oppressed, due to colonisation.  By wrongly blaming it for Maori failure … whilst completely ignoring the myriads of beneficial aspects that came from being colonised.             

With the consequence that due to this unjustified virtue signalling, the Maori Elite are laughing all the way to the Bank.

But the worst thing about it all is that, having got away with it so easily, they have their sights firmly set on ultimate “CONTROL”.  With us being at their mercy.

And they are well and truly on their way to achieving their goal.  Because it has reached the stage where they’ll not only be accepted into a future Co-governance agenda, but the seriously frightening bit is that they’ll hold power of ‘VETO’ over the rest of us.

That means they will have the final say in everything – thus ultimate control to hold the rest of us, our property and our rights, to ransom.

1 2 3 … 9
Copyright © 2023 Tross Publishing. All rights reserved.