VACCINATION MANIA = CHILD ABUSE

September 12, 2025
, , , , , New Zealand Government, Vaccinations

Ron Asher

Just as the neo-Marxist Department of Education, aided and abetted by the Teachers’ Union, has been responsible for the dramatic fall in educational standards in recent years so too has the incompetent and deceitful Department of Health been responsible for a worsening of the nation’s health. A Department that promotes potentially dangerous vaccines and lies about their safety cannot be trusted to tell the truth on these or other matters.

Like virtually all the Health Departments in the world New Zealand’s has been captured by Big Pharma, which pushes its various money-making drugs on to the population using the health bureaucrats as its “useful idiots”. Big Pharma, consisting of an oligarchy of huge, multi-national and often criminal companies, is one of the greatest threats facing mankind.

Take the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, for example. This vaccine is produced by Merck Sharp and Dohme, which in 2011 agreed to pay a fine of US$900 million for selling the painkiller Vioxx for four years, leaving behind a trail of patients with heart seizures and strokes. The following year it had to pay a US$328 million fine on criminal charges in the United States in respect of its aggressive marketing of unsafe drugs. And yet this is the company that the New Zealand Department of Health teamed up with to push Gardasil on to 12 year old girls. Thus did this company become the main partner in the N.Z. Health Department’s cervical cancer (HPV) campaign. This injecting of Gardasil into the arms of schoolgirls can lead to dire consequences such as infertility, mercury poisoning leading to shaking and uncontrollable coughing, and an inability to walk.

In the words of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, “This HPV vaccine costs hundreds of dollars [each dose] for something that most of the recipients do not even need protection against….The disease it supposedly protects against is not even contagious in the school environment.” 1

Gardasil is unnecessary for twelve year olds since cervical cancer is something that, if one was to contract it, it would be in the later years of life. According to the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics report on Gardasil, “To date clinical trial evidence has not demonstrated that Gardasil can actually prevent cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer deaths) because the follow-up period (5 years) was too short while cervical cancer takes 20 to 40 years to develop”. 2

In other words, they are promoting a vaccine to 12 year olds that is effective for only about 5 years and these girls are unlikely to get cervical cancer (if at all) until they are decades older. However, this does not matter to the Department since the main purpose of Gardasil seems to be to boost the profits of Merck, Sharp and Dohme rather than to be effective in combatting cervical cancer.

Despite this dodgy and potentially harmful drug failing to meet a single one of the four criteria required by the American FDA for Fast Track Approval (which it received) Gardasil is “demonstrably neither safer nor more effective than the Pap screening combined with LEEP, nor can it improve the diagnosis of serious cervical cancer outcomes”, wrote Canadian research scientists, Doctors Lucija Tomlejenovic and Christopher Shaw. 3

Several of these young girls, who should be in the prime of life, have died after being vaccinated with Gardasil while others have suffered serious disabilities. No responsible parent should ever let their daughter (or son as they are now pushing it on to boys) anywhere near a Gardasil needle.

And yet New Zealand’s Ministry of Health continues to promote it, with one of its spokespeople boasting “We’d just like to encourage young women that [not “who”] are listening to this to please go [split infinitive] and have your Gardasil injection, because you will protect yourself for the rest of your life”. 4 This piece of nonsense was uttered by the Ministry’s Doctor Api Talemaitoga, whose ignorance of grammar seems to match his apparent ignorance of the effects of Gardasil as there is no evidence that it protects an injected girl from cervical cancer for the rest of her life. This is nothing more than non-science based propaganda to sing the praises and boost the profits of Big Pharma.

Over the last two generations Big Pharma has pushed its drugs more and more on to the population, starting with tiny babies. In fact, its drug pushing starts even before a baby is born as FREE injections are pushed by the Department on to pregnant mothers; these include flu injections, Covid injections and one for a “combo” of tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

Then, when the little baby is 6 weeks old its tiny and fragile body is subjected to a “rotavirus” oral vaccine given as liquid drops in the mouth (allegedly to combat diarrhoea), plus the first jab for pneumococcal (allegedly for pneumonia, and ear and sinus infections) and the first of three vaccinations for the combo of tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough. Plus jabs for polio, Hepatitis B and Hib (a type of flu). And all this at only six weeks old whereas a couple of generations ago none of these were deemed to be necessary in children so young. They have suddenly become “necessary” by the marketing departments of Big Pharma and the gullibility of health bureaucrats.

Then at three months the poor little mites are brought back for a second dose of rotavirus, the first jab for meningococcal B, and the second lot of: tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough, polio, Hepatitis B and Hib.

They push the Hepatitis B jab on to kids even where the mother tests negative for this disease and there is no plausible risk to the child since the primary routes of transmission are intravenous drug use and sexual activity. Prior to the introduction of this vaccine the risk of a baby dying from Hepatitis B was one in 7 million. 5 Using the total number of live births in New Zealand in 2024 (58,341) as the guide, this amounts to only one death from Hepatitis B in a baby in a total of 120 years!!! So, all these babies are being vaccinated against Hepatitis B to save one life in 120 years. There is no other explanation for this unnecessary vaccination and the corruption of science that it involves other than the hold that the multi-national companies of Big Pharma have over New Zealand’s little Department of Health.

And is this the end of pumping all these questionable substances into the arms and feet of the infants? Of course not. Two months later (at 5 months old) comes another torrent of jabs – the second of pneumococcal, the second of meningococcal, and the third of diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, polio, Hepatitis B and Hib.

A few months later they are jabbed for flu and then as a year old their birthday treat is the horror of more needles, this time the final shot for pneumococcal and the first shot for measles, mumps and rubella.

Three months later the needles come again to pump in a booster shot for Hib, a jab for chicken pox, and the second lot for measles, mumps and rubella. Then at four years old they get boosters for diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus and polio.

So, is all this over-medicating of infants, that was not done two or three generations ago, resulting in a healthier population? Not at all as one in four New Zealanders now have chronic diseases (cancer, heart disease, strokes, diabetes and obesity) – a much higher rate (and rising) than before these vaccinations became so “necessary”.

According to the C.D.C. in the United States 76.4% of Americans now have a chronic disease whereas in 1961 it was 11% and in 1950 a mere 3%. Hardly surprising in view of this new cocktail of drugs all working against each other inside one’s body. In America a child has had 18 jabs by age 18 months and 76 jabs by age 18, certain jabs being mandatory in order to attend school in various states. And the result? A massive increase in autism. In 1970, fewer than one in 10,000 children in America had autism whereas now it is one in 33. If there is any better explanation for this rise in autism throughout the Western world than the over-medicating of children through vaccinations and the addition of fluoride and other questionable substances to the water supply, then it is yet to reveal itself.

The truth is that the vaccinated population is far more prone to chronic illness than people who have not had their bodies exposed to vaccines and whose natural immunity makes them for the most part resistant to the diseases that the vaccines are alleged by Big Pharma to combat.

When the Covid hysteria was unleashed children were once again targeted by Big Pharma and its puppets in the Health Department even though the incidence of Covid in children was so low that they were less likely to get it than the normal flu, thus showing that there was no need to vaccinate them. Among those who opposed vaccinating children against Covid was Doctor Ben Carson, paediatric surgeon at the prestigious John Hopkins Hospital at Baltimore, Maryland, since the risk of them contracting Covid was .025% – the same for seasonal flu for which children are not vaccinated en masse. However, that was not part of the plan of Jacinda Ardern, who set herself up as everybody’s cruel stepmother.

In the words of Doctor Rene de Monchy, a Tauranga G.P., “This is not so much about health but more about politics, money, power and social manipulation….What closed the door for me was when the vaccines were also given to children, who are absolutely not at risk from corona infection…..The immune system, especially of a child, is a delicate interplay. It is like a symphony orchestra with several sections: the winds, strings and percussion, all of which must fill in at just the right time. By administering vaccinations whose effects are still largely unknown, you are going to disrupt this interplay.” 6

Doctor de Monchy’s concerns were shared by other doctors, including Doctor Matt Shelton of Plimmerton, who at a news conference on 15 November, 2021, deplored using this experimental vaccine with unknown long-term effects on children whose lives are ahead of them. He claimed that there are likely to be greater problems for children from the jab since in its rushed trials for the vaccine Pfizer had nowhere near enough children to produce any meaningful findings.

In the words of Doctor Robert Malone, “Physical damage to children from injecting them with genetic vaccines in order to protect the elderly from a virus is occurring….The vaccines do not protect our children from becoming infected with Omicron, and do not protect infected children from infecting others. These [genetic vaccines] may damage their [children’s] brain, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.” 7

And a report from scientists in the United States and Europe concluded that the risks related to vaccines outweigh any potential benefits for children. “The bulk of the attributed Covid-19 deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities [having two or more diseases simultaneously], and the Covid-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children”. 8  So why subject an innocent child to a life of unknown risks?

According to an FDA of America Fact Sheet some 86% of 12 to 15 year olds suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccine in a clinical trial involving, 1,097 children who had had two jabs, plus another 30 who had had only one jab. The adverse reactions ranged from “mild” to “serious” and included fever, fatigue, headaches, chills, vomiting and diarrhoea. Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) data showed a 47% rise in all causes of deaths among teenagers (15 to 19) since the vaccination of this group commenced compared with the same period the year before.

In January, 2022, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health unrolled a vaccination push to jab the Covid vaccine needle into the arms of children 5 to 11 years old. This was in spite of the current advice from the World Health Organisation on its website: “There are currently no efficacy or safety data for children below the age of twelve years. Until such data are available individuals below twelve years of age should not be routinely vaccinated”.

So why did Ashley Bloomfield, head of the Health Department, defy this advice? The Ministry claimed that it took its advice from its partner, Pfizer, which had a financial incentive to inject as many people as possible regardless of the consequences. How could anybody believe anything that Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world, said for, like Merck, Sharp and Dohme (the Ministry’s partner in its Gardasil campaign), Pfizer, (its partner for Covid) is also a very shady company.

In 2009 Pfizer and its subsidiary company agreed to pay US$2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising out of the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products. This was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history. 9  At the same time in Nigeria Pfizer was sued by both the Nigerian federal and state authorities for harming African children with a trial of a new anti-biotic, Trovan. In 2009 Pfizer settled with the authorities for US$75 million and paid compensation to the families of those children who died.

As a willing and apparently uncritical accomplice of Big Pharma New Zealand’s Department of Health is barely worthy of belief in respect of anything that it puts on its website in relation to vaccinations. Until we have a government courageous and honest enough to straighten out this sinister combination of Big Pharma and health bureaucrats the safest thing for parents would appear to be to ignore the Department’s self-serving vaccination programmes and decide for themselves which vaccines (if any) should be given to their little ones. That way the children of New Zealand are less likely to have their bodies abused by ruthless, self-serving, money grubbing pharmaceutical companies and their docile handmaidens in the Ministry of Health injecting a cocktail of largely unnecessary drugs into their tiny bodies. Prescribing endless drugs while ignoring the root causes of diseases will do nothing to reduce disease among children but it will boost the profits of Big Pharma, which seems to be the whole purpose of this dangerous exercise. Natural immunity is usually better at combatting these diseases than endless vaccinations.

Ron Asher is the author of “A Jab in the Dark; Covid Vaccines and the new Health Dictatorship” (ISBN 9781872970 813), 190 pages, Price: $35 (incl. Postage within NZ). Available through www.trosspublishing.com or E-mail: trosspub@gmail.com

References:

  1. Totalitaria, Ian Wishart. P. 71-2
  2. Ibid P. 73
  3. Ibid P. 71-2
  4. Ibid, P. 73
  5. Secretary of Health Robt Kennedy’s evidence to Congress, Sept. 2025
  6. RAIR Foundation, 22 Dec. 2021
  7. open letter to Canadian truckers, 10 Feb. 2022
  8. Daily Expose 28 Sept. 2021
  9. US Dept of Justice 2 Sept. 2009

Maori Wards; the Churches have Lost the Plot.

August 22, 2025
, , Democracy, Maori, Maori Wards, NZ Local Government

Like all modern  democracies 21st century New Zealand contains people of many ethnicities and viewpoints. At election time they are all able to cast their votes equally to determine the type of government that we want. That is the essence of democracy for which our forebears fought for – and died for – in the two world wars.

However, in New Zealand, despite there being no full-blood Maoris or even half bloods (just a group who have a minority of Maori blood in their predominant European make-up) certain power manipulators have pushed for race-based “Maori wards” in local government in violation of the democratic principle of an equal and universal vote.

It is quite remarkable that, for a group of people who have been detribalised for more than a century and who don’t even have a preponderance of Maori blood in them, it is only now – in the 21st century – that we are told that they must suddenly have separate representation in the form of “Maori wards”. It is yet another power grab by the tribal elite against the rest of us.

Those part-Maoris elected to a “Maori ward” cannot be expected to make decisions for the public good as other councillors have to – but only for the benefit of their tribe. They have no reason to care about the rights or welfare of the general public to whom they are not accountable. They are accountable only to those part-Maoris who choose to be on the “Maori roll”, so why should they worry about the rest of us? Maori wards are the utmost in racial exclusiveness as, by their definition, they exclude the rest of society. It is hard to think of a more debilitating measure in respect of the common good.

In the coming local body elections those voters in municipalities that have already brought in Maori wards pursuant to the Ardern government’s allowance and promotion of such without ratepayer input, have a chance to get rid of these racist and undemocratic seats on councils, and anyone who believes in an inclusive democracy has only one option and that is to vote them out.

However, a group pf churchmen have spoken out and encouraged their ever dwindling congregations to vote for these racist measures. These include Catholics, Anglicans, Methodists and Baptists but not, to their credit, Presbyterians.

Ever since the 1970s and 1980s when the World Council of Churches (Protestant) and the Vatican sent money to murdering terrorist groups in southern Africa there has been a steady desertion of good people from the increasingly political and Left Wing established churches, and this latest promotion of apartheid by loud mouthed clerics will only hasten the process. People like to make up their own minds on non-spiritual things such as Maori wards and do not like to be dictated to by clergy who lead comfortable, often lazy and rather parasitical lives.

Probably the most ridiculous statement of this self-appointed group of politicians in dog-collars came from the Catholic Bishop Emeritus, Bishop Peter Cullinane, who said, “Jesus didn’t exclude people”. No, but these Maori wards do – they exclude all people other than those part-Maori who are on the Maori roll.

Like all New Zealanders part-Maoris are already represented – as is every citizen – by the councillors of general wards whom they can elect. If they wish, part-Maoris can also stand for council in a general ward – nothing to stop them and indeed many of them have been elected in this way. So, what is Cullinane up to by talking about “excluding” people? No Maoris have been excluded from voting for councillors for well over a century.

It seems that in his twisted mind he is trying to propagate the lie that part-Maoris are excluded from voting for councils. In fact, he seems to be implying that to “exclude” is something very bad – a sin. If so, he’s the one committing the sin by promoting race-based wards that exclude by far the majority of the ratepaying public.

Race based Maori wards are backward, exclusive to part-Maoris and detrimental to the public good. In every municipality where the vote is about to be taken on Maori wards the only option for anyone who believes in genuine democracy and a non-racist society is to vote them OUT.

SOME TRUTHS ABOUT THE RUSSIA/UKRAINE ISSUE

August 21, 2025
, , , , Russia, Ukraine

by John McLean.

Ukrainians are not Russians. It is not possible to understand Russia’s invasion of Ukraine without knowing something of the historical background. At their meeting in Alaska in August, 2025, Putin told the gullible and unintelligent Donald Trump that Ukraine is Russia’s “brotherly nation”. Not so.

Ukraine came into the Russian empire not by the will of its people but by force; by the late 18th century the last remnants of Ukraine’s autonomy were abolished. In 1783 Russia annexed Crimea and began settling it with Russian people. In the 19th century a Ukraine nationalist movement began but it faced political repression as well as restrictions on the use of the Ukraine language. Its expansive fields became the breadbasket of the Tsar’s empire and its farms were the most modern and efficient in that rather ramshackle empire.

After the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 the new authorities in Moscow set up a “Ukraine Soviet Socialist Republic”, which was strongly opposed by the people of Ukraine. The problem was Moscow’s demand for the “collectivisation” of Ukraine’s agriculture. Because Ukraine had been such a bountiful source of supply for grain, sugar and other agricultural products the Communist Party in Moscow made very heavy demands on Ukraine’s farmers – higher than for other areas – to provide food for the rest of the nation. To have met these quotas would have condemned thousands of villagers to certain starvation.

Since tens of thousands of Ukrainians had become militarised in the First World War against Austria and Germany it is not surprising to record that they formed themselves into guerrilla forces to resist Moscow’s “food requisitioning teams”. By 1919 these forces numbered more than 100,000 well-armed peasants and they captured many towns in southern Ukraine. In April, 1919, they set up an interim independent government.

In retaliation Moscow’s new and brutal Red Army burned hundreds of Ukraine’s villages and executed without trial thousands of people whom they deemed as “bandits” or “deserters”. This war between the Red Army and the Ukraine peasants lasted from 1920 to 1922 and resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands on both sides.

In Kharkov, Ukraine’s second largest city, the Russians carried out between 2,000 and 3,000 executions of “the possessing classes” between February and June, 1919. When the town was retaken in December of the same year another 1,000 to 2,000 were executed. Between mid November and the end of December, 1920, more than 50,000 people were shot or hanged by the Soviet authorities in Crimea.

Ukraine’s so-called “bourgeois” (middle class) were put into concentration camps while their property was looted, the loot going into the pockets of the local agents of the CHEKA, the early Soviet secret police and the forerunner to the KGB which later produced the “nice” Mr. Putin. To humiliate them further, middle class women were forced to clean toilets in Red Army barracks and many of them were raped by the Red Army, especially during Moscow’s recapture of the Ukraine in 1920.

One of the reasons why Ukrainians in the 21st century are so resistant to having Russian control of any part of their “brotherly nation” is because the Russian Army has a long tradition of raping those in areas that it occupies. Russia has always been a barbaric country (and still is) and never more so than in raping women – and sometimes men – in newly acquired territories.

In the Second World War Russian soldiers raped large numbers of women in Rumania and Budapest as its army rolled westward. Between 70,000 and 100,000 Austrian women were raped in Vienna alone. However, this was only the “curtain-raiser” for what happened when Soviet armies entered German territory. There the Russians raped thousands of women from 8 years old to 80 – especially in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia. Some women, especially young, attractive ones, were raped 60 or 70 times.

In the words of the eminent Second World War historian, Antony Beevor, it was “the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history”. In total it has been estimated that some two million German women were raped by the invading Soviet troops. The rapes continued in Soviet controlled East Germany until the winter of 1947-8.

And the reaction of the Russians? Stalin, their supreme warlord, declared, “One should understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle”. In the present war in the Ukraine there have been reports of several rapes by Russian forces of both men and women, – hardly surprising in view of the entrenched tradition of rape in Russia’s armies.

By 1922 the Russians had prevailed in their military conquest of Ukraine and so Mr. Putin’s “brotherly nation” was incorporated into the Soviet Union by force and against the wishes of its people, thereby creating a long term and justified grievance.

In the 1920s the rule of the Communist Party was as brutal in Ukraine as it was in other parts of the Soviet Union under the “iron rule” of the party-state – a new form of slavery. In 1920 the State embarked on a campaign of assaults against Ukraine’s intelligentsia, who were accused of “nationalist deviations” from the Party line.

In the newly collectivised of the confiscated and now nationalised farms the State began to take an ever increasing share of the collective harvest, thus threatening the peasants’ very survival. In 1930 the State took 30% of Ukraine’s agricultural productions but then, in 1931 when the harvest was smaller, it took 41.5%, leaving an inadequate amount for the peasants themselves, for the cattle to eat, for sowing next season and for selling to the local area.

On 7th August, 1932, the party issued an edict executing or imprisoning in labour camps anyone whom they alleged had “committed theft or damage of socialist property” (holding back some grain to feed one’s hungry family). Between this date and December, 1933, more than 125,000 people throughout the Soviet Union were convicted under this law, including 5,400 sentenced to death.

Molotov, the thug sent by Moscow to enforce its will in Ukraine, blacklisted all districts in which the demanded quotas were not met. Of course, this did not increase production and so Stalin decided on a war against Ukraine’s peasants/farmers to starve them out. This particular form of genocide began with the Party’s demand for ALL the grain of a district, including reserves that were being kept back for sowing in the following year. Thus did he deliberately create a man-made famine.

Starved of food, rural people flocked to Ukraine’s cities. However, to combat this and to ensure that they would starve to death, the party introduced new and compulsory identity papers plus the obligatory registration of all citizens. This was a death sentence for millions as they were escorted back to their farms and villages to die. They were tortured to hand over any remaining supplies in this carefully planned genocide.

To underline the man-made nature of this famine one only needs to record that in 1933, while millions were dying of starvation in Ukraine, the Soviet Union continued to export grain in order to get foreign exchange.

The whole of Ukraine was a hunger zone and the total death toll from this man-made famine has been estimated at four million by the multi-authored and well researched Black Book of Communism while other estimates have put it at five million. Is it any wonder that the people of Ukraine to-day do not want a bar of any Russian occupation of their territory? The historical background of this issue between Russia and its “brotherly nation” of Ukraine makes all the more odious Donald Trump’s efforts to paint the Ukrainians as “”wrongdoers” and even “aggressors” and his Russian friends as much deserving invaders.

1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 22
Copyright © 2023 Tross Publishing. All rights reserved.