Socialism Within NZ Politics

By Kerry Butler

We are facing a very frightening scenario, whereby the four likely Partners in a Labour led coalition are all of a Socialist persuasion.

Firstly, take a look at Labour’s present leader, Chris Hipkins, who knows no other way than to follow in the footsteps of Comrade Jacinda.

And the next likely Labour leader, and thus maybe a future Prime Minister of our country, Kieran McAnulty, openly admitted in the Parliamentary debating chamber that, quote: “I am a Socialist … and I’m proud of it”.

Several other Labour politicians have also ‘come out’ and admitted that they are too. So, it seems these types no longer even try to hide their true aspirations.

Then add into the mix Comrade Chloe of the Green Communist Party.

Plus, the Opportunity Party wannabes who have conned a lot of gullible (ignorant) fools into believing that they are a “centrist” Party.

Come on. Take a look at their communist policy of wanting to make ALL of us beneficiaries of the State. With the true intent being the opportunity to have us under their “power”.

Then the final nail in the left leaning coffin is the Maori “Terrorist” Party whose goal is to attain co-governance, including power of veto … which in effect, means our prospects in life will be under the ‘control’ of a Maori “Dictatorship”.

What you’ll notice about every one of those aspiring Parties is that their policy centres on tax, tax, tax, and more tax.

Which of course, shows their true colours, i.e. a commitment to taking from the “achievers” so as to redistribute to the masses … in order to make us all more equal. Which is classic Socialism in the form of Communism.

In other words, due to lack of real-world experience, those ignorant dreamers can’t see the downside of their socialist agenda.

So … the real danger of that lot being in power, is that we’ll never, as individuals, or as the country as a whole, be able to get ahead. Because as fast as we make it, they’ll take it.

Which means we’ll be stuffed … because free enterprise would be stifled due to the shortsighted ideology of those in power making it not worthwhile for businesses or individuals to take the risk of investing too much, due to being punished by having their hard-earned prosperity taken off them. Success is a dirty word to Socialists.

With the end result being that economic growth will collapse, because the go-getters either move their business to another country … or just drift along in survival mode, by cutting back expansion, and thus employment.

And the tragedy is that Lefties are unable to grasp the fact that high achievers give others an incentive to emulate them. This is a human characteristic … where the same thing happens in sport. People need someone to look up to, as their incentive to try hard.

Whereas, these Socialists with their “attitude” problem (envy) i.e. chip on shoulder, would really like us all on an equal footing … which of course, will only lead to general mediocracy. Which is not the way for a country to prosper.

The irony is that socialist agendas invariably lead to failure because the supply of other people’s money eventually runs out.

The real problem we’re facing as regards preventing this crusade from coming about, is that Luxon and his tight five, who we rely on our “saviours”, are all closet “Wokesters” which subconsciously encourages Leftist tendencies.

So, with matters such as taking from us, the National Caucus members may as well be called Socialists also, because they’re willing to unjustifiably hand billions of dollars (by one means or another) to Maori.

All because of that old socialist policy of trying to bring Maori up to a so-called equitable standing in society (not that much, if any, ever trickles past the elite Gangsters, down to ordinary Maori). Which is not the answer anyway, because if taking money from us to share with them, i.e. when handing out money unearned, you end up with a class of people who, in a concerning number of cases, become useless.

And in the process of this futile benevolence, our country is crippled. All due to an unrecognised (or hidden) socialist mentality.

The crux of the matter is, our only hope lies in NZ First and ACT, of which the latter seems to be more committed to free enterprise.

A SALUTE TO THE GREATEST NEW ZEALANDER

By John McLean

The Sunday closest to 15th September is traditionally Battle of Britain Sunday. I remember as a child seeing men proudly wearing their medals to church on this sacred day as well as an elderly neighbour turning up there wearing a breastful of colourful medals – those earned by her two sons, both of whom were killed in Bomber Command within a very short time of each other.

Sunday, 15th September, 1940, was the turning point in the all-important Battle of Britain, which decided whether Tyranny or Freedom would prevail. In this battle of destiny for the human race the direction of the fighting was in the hands of the New Zealander, Air Vice-Marshal Sir Keith Park.

This remarkable man had been born in 1892 at Thames on the Coromandel Peninsula where his father, the Scots born James Park, was the director of the Thames School of Mines. In the First World War Keith Park joined the Army, serving at Gallipoli and on the Western Front. In 1917 he joined the infant Royal Flying Corps which, after the War, became part of the newly created Royal Air Force.

In early 1940 Air Vice-Marshal Park was appointed Air Officer Commanding (AOC) of No. 11 Group of Fighter Command – just in time for the forthcoming Battle of Britain. The area of No. 11 Group stretched from Southampton to Norwich, taking in all of south-east England, including London. This was the front line for the air battles in the greatest and most significant air conflict in history, which to-day is called the Battle of Britain.

In the words of Mr. Terry Smith, the British businessman who sponsored the erection of a statue of Sir Keith in London’s Waterloo Place: “It has been said that Fighter Command in 1940 was a weapon that Air Chief Marshal Lord Dowding devised, Winston Churchill decided to use, and Sir Keith Park wielded in battle.” Destiny dealt each of these three men a particular hand that they played to perfection.

With France defeated the Nazis knew that they had to conquer Britain or lose the War and so it was that they devised Operation “Sea Lion”, the proposed invasion of England across the Channel. Napoleon had tried the same trick but he needed “a fair wind to England” to get across – a wind that the Royal Navy never gave him. Just as the pilots of Fighter Command would deny the Luftwaffe air superiority over the Channel, which they needed for a successful invasion.
Nevertheless German preparations continued after Dunkirk as they massed an invasion fleet in the Channel ports of Occupied France and Belgium for their great Operation Sea Lion. No. 11 Group was the main force to prevent all this.

Park controlled and managed squadrons of Spitfires and Hurricanes from his bomb proof operations room fifty feet underground in Uxbridge, outer London. However, like Wellington at Waterloo riding his horse up and down the front line, filling in gaps where necessary, Keith Park was also a hands-on commander, flying his own Hurricane to the various fighter aerodromes to understand the dynamics of the fighting and to get first-hand information about German planes, guns and tactics. Throughout the Battle of Britain he flew about 100 hours on these investigative missions. During the evacuation of Dunkirk he made flights over the French coast to gain first hand intelligence of the progress of the evacuation (338,226 British and French soldiers evacuated in nine days).

In his underground headquarters Park had a small group of about twenty highly skilled personnel (plus telephone assistants) – both men and women – who co-ordinated the radar findings as well as the spottings by the 50,000 plus Observer Corps with their field-glasses and portable telephones so as to find out the routes of the approaching German planes and their likely numbers. From all this information Park issued orders to his twenty-five squadrons when to take off and in what direction.

This underground control centre was about 60 feet across and had a gallery around its walls (the “Dress Circle”). Covering one entire wall was a huge blackboard, divided into six columns with electric bulbs, for the six Fighter Stations, each squadron having a sub-column of its own, and divided laterally into Standing By (2 minutes notice), Readiness (5 minutes), Available (20 minutes), and those that had taken off and those in action.

“Strategically brilliant, innovative and flexible, Park was always thinking three steps ahead, predicting what the enemy would do but ready to adjust a plan at a moment’s notice”, wrote the British journalist, Marcus Dunk, in the International Express of 16th October, 2007. Despite the immensity of the stakes, “he remained steadfast and a model of calm leadership”. (Ibid)

In the words of Winston Churchill in Volume II of his war memoirs (P. 293), writing of September, 1940, “Air Vice-Marshal Park had for six months commanded this Group (No. 11), on which our fate largely depended. From the beginning of Dunkirk all the daylight actions in the south of England had already been conducted by him”.

“The tall, lean New Zealander displayed the unusual combination of intense individual activity and initiative with a capacity for teamwork and co-ordination,” wrote the author, Eugene Grayland.

After the Fall of Fance it was Britain’s turn to face the Luftwaffe – alone with only its loyal Empire. The targets were Park’s fighter stations in south-east England as well as London. At a serious disadvantage in the number of planes vis-a-vis Germany, Park instructed his pilots to split their attacks, half going for the bombers and the other half attacking the escort. This tactic forced the enemy formations to fly tighter, thus presenting better targets.

The R.A.F. was heavily outnumbered and it was known that, however many planes the Luftwaffe sent across, there were many more in reserve in Germany and Occupied France. And so from the British point of view the whole thing was rather nail-biting.

15th September, 1940, was a particularly sunny Sunday and Churchill and his wife decided to visit Park’s headquarters at Uxbridge to see how things were going. In Sir Winston’s words: “I don’t know’, said Park, as we went down, ‘whether anything will happen to-day. At present all is quiet.’ However, after a quarter of an hour the raid-plotters began to move about. An attack of 40-plus was reported…Then in quick succession 20-plus, 40-plus signals were received, and in another ten minutes it was evident that a serious battle impended. On both sides the air began to fill. One after another signals came in, 40-plus, 60-plus; there was even an 80-plus….On the blackboard facing us the rising lights showed our fighter squadrons getting into the air….

Presently the red bulbs showed that the majority of our squadrons were engaged. A subdued hum arose from the floor, where the busy plotters pushed their discs to and fro in accordance with the swiftly changing situation. Air Vice-Marshal Park gave general directions for the disposition of his fighter force, which were translated into detailed orders to each Fighter Station…..

The Air Marshal himself walked up and down, watching with vigilant eye every move in the game and only occasionally intervening with some decisive order, usually to reinforce a threatened area. In a little while all our squadrons were fighting, and some had already begun to return for fuel. All were in the air. There was not one squadron left in reserve. At this moment Park spoke to Dowding at Stanmore, asking for three squadrons from No. 12 Group to be put at his disposal in case of another major attack while his squadrons were rearming and refuelling. This was done…..I became conscious of the anxiety of the Commander, who now stood still behind his subordinate’s chair. Hitherto I had watched in silence. I now asked, ‘What other reserves have we?’

‘There are none’, said Air Vice-Marshal Park. In an account which he wrote about it afterwards he said that at this I ‘looked grave’. Well I might. What losses should we not suffer if our refuelling planes were caught on the ground by further raids of 40-plus or 50-plus. The odds were great; our margins small; the stakes infinite.

Another five minutes passed and most of our squadrons had now descended to refuel. Then it appeared that the enemy were going home. The shifting of the discs on the table below showed a continuous eastward movement of German bombers and fighters. No new attack appeared. In another ten minutes the action was ended. ‘We are very glad you have seen this’, said Park. ‘Of course, during the last twenty minutes we were so choked with information that we couldn’t handle it. This shows you the limitation of our present resources. They have been strained far beyond their limits to-day’.”

Post-war information showed that on this vital day – the “crux of the Battle of Britain” as Churchill called it – 56 German planes were shot down while we lost 28. It was not a great number of enemy losses but it was enough to change the direction and ultimate outcome of the War as two days later, on 17 September, Hitler decided to postpone Operation Sea Lion indefinitely. Then on 12 October the invasion was formally called off until the following spring. Then, in July, 1941, it was postponed again by Hitler until the spring of 1942. On 13 February, 1942, Hitler agreed to a complete stand-down. In Churchill’s words, “Thus perished Operation Sea Lion. And September 15th may stand as the date of its demise.”

“It is clear that, more than any other individual, Park saved London and saved Britain,” said Terry Smith. The words on the statue in Waterloo Place describe him as “Defender of London”.

Of all the Prime Ministers since Churchill, Boris Johnson is the one with the best grasp of history. This is what he said at the time of the unveiling of Park’s statue in 2009: “In helping to save Britain he helped to save Europe from tyranny, and in helping to save our nation’s capital, he saved the love of democracy – the generosity, the tolerance….that gives London its character and makes it the greatest city on earth.”

Lord Tedder, a colleague of Park’s and later Chief of Air Staff in Britain, said, “If any one man won the Battle of Britain, he [Park] did. I do not believe it is realised how much that one man, with his leadership, his calm judgement and his skill, did to save not only this country but the world”.

At the end of 1940 Park was relieved of his command. Although this is capable of misinterpretation the truth is that he, like any other commander placed in that position, had been under too much pressure for too long and he needed something of a rest. He was put in control of Training Command, and then in July, 1942, was made A.O.C. Malta and then Allied Air Commander South-East Asia where he assisted Mountbatten in taking the Japanese surrender in Singapore. He returned to New Zealand where he died in 1975.

There have been other notable New Zealanders – one a double V.C., one four times Wimbledon Men’s Singles Champion, one alleged to be the first to fly a plane, and one who climbed Mount Everest. But in the unique role that he played in world history Keith Park stands head and shoulders above them all. And 15th September, 1940, was his greatest moment. His conduct of the battle on that day prevented Operation Sea Lion and the triumph of Nazism.

THE FRAUD OF FEMINISM

By Ron Asher

Modern New Zealand is based on certain truths but also on an increasing number of lies, e.g. the Treaty of Waitangi was a “partnership” (no, it was a treaty of cession), before the arrival of the white man the Maoris led an easy and happy life (cannibalism, slavery, infanticide – especially of female babies – human sacrifice on the death of a chief and endless tribal wars in which tens of thousands of them were killed), multi-culturalism is “wonderful” (it is subversive of social cohesion, undermines the trust and safety of a homogenous society, and introduces unnecessary discord – Muslims v. Jews, Muslims v. Christians, Muslims v. Hindus), DoC’s lie that its 1080 poison “saves native birds” (it kills all creatures requiring oxygen to breathe, including native birds), Jacinda Ardern is “kind” (the cruellest P.M. ever as she so enthusiastically embraced abortion and drove people out of their jobs by her unnecessary “Covid mandates”), the Pfizer vaccine for Covid was “safe and effective” (it was neither), and some people are “trans-gender” (biologically impossible). The particular lie that will be dealt with in this article is that the socially destructive and unnatural doctrine of feminism is so wonderful that no one should be allowed to question it.

Feminism started in the later years of the 20th century by a gang of women academics (mostly lesbian) in universities in Massachusetts, a state long known for its narrow-mindedness since it was begun by the intolerant Puritans in 1620. Feminism had (and still has) nothing to do with raising the well-being of women in general. It is all about getting ever more highly paid jobs for “career women” at the expense of the hated male of the species.

Feminists like Hilary Clinton talk forever about breaking through “glass ceilings” to get top jobs as C.E.O.s etc. but never are they heard to take up the cudgels for the hundreds of millions of oppressed women in Islamic countries who are forced to wear ugly and uncomfortable clothing, who are allowed by Islam to be physically beaten by their husbands, and who have inferior rights over a wide area. These poor women just don’t count in the eyes of the greedy, man-hating lesbians who run the feminist agenda in the West.

Like all false doctrines feminism is based on various lies, the most basic of which is that men and women are interchangeable whereas in fact they are complimentary to each other and not interchangeable.

This modern and artificial “interchangeability” of men and women has not only created much confusion and unfair discrimination against men but it has also undermined the home and led to unnecessary social problems arising from women putting “career” ahead of the natural duties of motherhood and the home. Women bishops, women judges, women army generals and women naval captains are the more ridiculous of this new and unnatural phenomenon – all that neglect of home, husband and children just to be laughed at!

The ideal place for the mother of a young family is in the home and not in the workplace. Women who recognise this and give their time to their children are far more useful to society than those who are indoctrinated by the feminists into believing that they can have both children and a career when, in fact, too often they finish up doing neither very well, thus failing in the most important role of a woman, which is as a mother.

There are, of course, some genuine cases where a mother has to work either full-time or part-time to help pay the household bills but in other cases, where a husband is capable of earning for the family, it is neither necessary nor desirable for the mother of young children to work outside the home.

Too many of them have had their minds programmed by the ideology that one must have a “career” to feel fulfilled as a woman. This comes from the movement’s permanent lesbian leadership who, not having children themselves, are incapable of understanding the nature and duties of motherhood (or even of wifehood).

The women so indoctrinated are the victims of feminism. So too are the husbands and children. What husband would want to arrive home in the evening from work to a wife still pre-occupied and harassed with her own workplace issues and too tired to offer anything for dinner except takeaways rather than to one who has had the time to cook a nice meal and look her best with a kiss for the husband and an easy drink before dinner? And children too. They need discipline and boundaries and a lot of fun, and these are more likely to be received from a full-time mother than a part-time one.

Feminism is such an artificial and unnatural doctrine that it can be enforced only by massive intimidation. In New Zealand the instrument for this dictated thinking is all the ambitious, young female journalists who think they can change the world by their biased reporting and indoctrination. So, what is the harm of women journalists? The harm is the way that they all think the same way and, by embracing a narrow ideology such as feminism, are not representative of women in general.

We saw this recently in the matter of the former Labour M.P., Stuart Nash, who had been selected as a candidate for New Zealand First. He stated that the National M.P. for Napier, Katie Nimon, whom he was standing against, was “lazy” for taking parental leave. She had taken SIX MONTHS off from Parliament to look after her newly born son. In other words, the voters of Napier were more or less without an M.P. for one sixth of the term that she had undertaken to serve them at the last election.

Even though Stuart Nash is hardly a political giant and was standing for a small party that was (and is) unlikely to take the seat of Napier, the reaction of the feminist dominated media was hysterical in the extreme. TV1 News at Six, which has long since ceased to be a reliable and unbiased news service, devoted around half its time that night to a sustained “hate” campaign against Stuart Nash for stating what at first sight seems to be a truth.

National M.P. Nicola Grigg, who also had a baby when she was an M.P., screamed (maybe out of guilt): “There is absolutely no place for people like that [Nash] in our House of Representatives”. What about his right to free speech? Luxon waded in in his usual manner of trying to ingratiate himself with the Left wing media by stating that Nash owed Katie Nimon an apology. What for? Telling the truth?

The job of an electorate M.P. – as Katie Nimon is – is a demanding and responsible one, and one is entitled to question whether the mother of a newly born baby is a suitable one to be an M.P. She comes across as a very ambitious and calculating person and doesn’t seem to have grasped the truth that, while anybody can be an M.P., only she can be the mother of her baby and carry out that function, which is far more important than being an M.P.

The role of women in the short history of New Zealand has been hugely positive as they were the ones who introduced and upheld the civilising influences that created our society on these distant shores. “It was the women who….softened the rough edges of life and helped civilise pioneering society. As the battle for survival was won and the settlers began to establish a home, rather than just a shelter against the elements, then the role of the wife became increasingly important. She both civilised her physical surroundings and set the style of the new colonial society, imposing the conventions and niceties of European civilisation on frontier life. The achievement, carried out when life was still a constant battle against unfamiliar climates, hostile natives, physical hardships, loneliness, poverty and isolation, was of very real and lasting significance,” wrote Valerie Bethell in “The British Empire”. (Vol. V, P. 115)

The pioneer women were smarter than those later infected by feminism – especially in the timing of childbirth. Biologically speaking men and women are at the height of their sexual power at around the age of twenty-one while the optimum period for a woman to give birth is between the late teens and the late twenties. In the pioneer days that was when most women had the bulk of their children. In prioritising a “career” over having children, feminism persuades young women to defy the eternal rules of biology and to “put off” having children until the mid to late thirties by which time many women cannot conceive while others can’t find a mate because they have become so obsessed with their “careers” that they have become boring to men.

The women of to-day who have dodged the bullet of feminism are the lucky ones and the ones to be admired. The caring and thoughtful full-time mother is the highest and most admirable state that a woman can reach – far higher than that of Chief Justice or Prime Minister.

1 2 3 23