IS PAUL GOLDSMITH THE BIGGEST LIAR IN PARLIAMENT?

November 17, 2024
, , Maori, NZ Parliament

By Toby Whittaker

Although unlikely to be passed into law the ACT Party’s Treaty Principles Bill has certainly exposed some ugly facets of New Zealand politics – from the uncivilised and barbarous disruption of Parliament by Maori Party M.P.s (cheered on by Labour and the Greens) to the cowardice of the Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, in promising to “support” the Bill through its First Reading and Select Committee hearings but then, after being “got at” by tribal thugs at Waitangi on 6th February, he ran backwards like a frightened rat.

In the words of Dr. John Robinson in his latest book, Who Really Broke the Treaty?, “To any reasonable person this (“support”) implies positive support throughout that stage, with further action guided by the report of the Select Committee….All submissions would be listened to by the Select Committee and Parliament, so we were led to believe. No way. Luxon announced in no uncertain terms that National would not support the Bill, no matter what the public opinion is. David Seymour then commented sensibly that only after the public has spoken will a final decision be made.” Why would people bother to make a submission when they have been told by Luxon that whatever they say will not be listened to?

Worse, National has embarked on a campaign of lies to discredit this worthy Bill, with Minister for Treaty Negotiations, Paul Goldsmith, apparently being given the role of Liar-in-Chief. In an e-mail to the well-known writer and commentator, Amy Brooke, Goldsmith wrote, “Successive National Governments have worked well with Maori while ensuring equal citizenship and equal opportunity for all New Zealanders”.

Goldsmith entered Parliament as a National List M.P. In 2011, having previously worked for that notoriously biased institution, the Waitangi Tribunal. Below is a list of statutes that the National Government (including Goldsmith) voted for which grant considerable race-based rights to those of part-Maori descent over and above all other New Zealanders.

Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2102 – decisions to be informed by a Maori perspective; hearings must recognise tikanga Maori where appropriate and receive oral or written evidence in Maori.

National Animal Identification and Tracing Act 2012 – values to be protected include the relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, waters, sites, wahi tapu and taonga.

Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Waipa River Act) 2012 – an anti-democratic co-governance entity set up to manage the Waipa, many of the appointments being race based – part-Maoris only!

Ngati Manuhiri Claims Settlement Act 2012 – another co-governance racket giving certain race-based appointments to part-Maoris only.

Game Animals Council Act 2013 – Council members must have knowledge of, and experience relating to, Maori “hunting interests”.

Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013 – majority of members of an appointed territorial authority panel must have knowledge of and expertise in relation to planning, design, and engineering and appropriate knowledge and experience relating to the Treaty of Waitangi and tikanga Maori.

Mokomoko (Restoration of Character, Mana, and Reputation) Act 2013 – a parliamentary pardon for the brutal murderers of Rev. Carl Volkner in Opotiki in 1866! The master-mind of this atrocity was Kereopa te Rau of the Ngati Rangiwewehi clan of the Arawa tribe who hailed from the north-west shore of Rotorua. In the words of James Cowan, the leading historian of the Maori wars, “He was a thoroughgoing old savage, and he quickly plunged into the worst excesses, even cannibalism”. Volkner, who had ministered to the local Maoris for several years, was beheaded and, in the words of Captain Levy of the Eclipse who was present, “The natives then formed themselves into a line and prepared to taste the blood as it ran out of the head and body”. 

They then gathered inside Volkner’s church and Kereopa, dressed in Volkner’s long black robe, placed the dripping head on the reading desk and filled the communion cup with Volkner’s blood; this was then passed around and drunk. From the pulpit Kereopa ate Volkner’s eyes in front of about a hundred natives. Four of the murderers, Mokomoko, Heremita, Kahupaea and Kereopa, were put on trial, convicted and hanged. But on 21 June, 2014, the National government of which Goldsmith was a part, pardoned the murderers for their horrific crime – a murder that was witnessed by over a hundred Maoris plus some settlers. Then to drive home the insult to Volkner’s memory even further this same shameless National government of 2014 gave $6 million of taxpayers’ money plus a forest and several valuable hot springs around Rotorua to Kereopa’s greedy tribe. 

Ngati Whatua o Kaipara Claims Settlemwent Act 2013 – claims “The relationship between Ngati Whatua and the Crown was founded on the partnership created in 1840 through the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi”. This is a lie as there was no partnership of any kind.

Patents Act 2013 – established a Maori Advisory Committee whose members must have knowledge of matauranga and tikanga, to advise on patent applications.

Arts Council of N.Z. Toi Aotearoa Act 2014 – at least four members must have knowledge of te ao Maori and tikanga. The Council must recognise in the arts “the role of Maori as tangata whenua”.

NZ Mission Trust Board (Otamataha) Empowering Act 2014 – declared that the 1852 Crown grant that awarded the land to the Church Mission Society was in breach of the “Teaty principle of active protection” even though there is no such principle in the Treaty and, in fact, such “principles” were only invented in 1986!

Tapuika Claims Settlement Act 2014 – set up co-governance of the Kaituna River; the Authority must acknowledge the interests of iwi. 

Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 – scientific investigation of any site of interest to Maori requires the consent of iwi and hapu.

Environmental Reporting Act 2014 – require that synthesis and domain reports “are informed by a Maori perspective” and that regulations can not be made without consultation with iwi authorities.

Hawkes Bay Regional Planning Committee Act 2015 – an anti-democratic statute that requires co-governance between “mana whenua and elected representatives” overseeing development and review of Resource Management Act documents. The Committee standing orders “must not contravene tikanga Maori” (whatever that means). 

Ngai Takoto Claims Settlement Act 2015, Te Aupouri Claims Settlement Act 2015, and Te Rarawa Claims Settlement Act 2015 – all these Acts give tribal rights over conservative land – land that should belong to all New Zealanders. 

Environmental Canterbury (Transitional Governance Arrangements) Act 2016 – two members of the powerful transitional governing body must be nominees of the greedy Ngai Tahu tribe and must have knowledge of and expertise in relation to tikanga.

Hurunui/Kaikoura Earthquakes Recovery Act 2016 – members of the Recovery Review Panel to have knowledge of matauranga and tikanga. 

Te Ture mo Te Reo Maori Language Act 2016 – states (falsely) that the Maori language is protected by Article Two of the Treaty.

Land Transfer Act 2017 – an application for adverse possession cannot be made against Maori land – only against non-Maori land.

Resource Legislation Amendment Act 2017 – agreements to provide a mechanism for tangata whenua through iwi authorities to participate in resource and decision-making processes.

Te Awa Tupuna (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 – gives part-Maoris considerable powers over the Wanganui River.

So, having voted for these and other measures doling out race-based privileges and resources to part-Maoris at the expense of the rest of us, Goldsmith has the effrontery to declare that National Governments have “ensured equal citizenship and equal opportunity for all New Zealanders”!!!!!!!!!!!! Was he asleep when he voted for all these pieces of racist legislation? 

It is bad enough for the National Party to try to sabotage this Bill that is designed to restore equality of citizenship to a country that has lost it over the years – thanks to National, Labour and our rotten judges. But please Mr. Goldsmith spare us the lie that National has given equality of citizenship and opportunity over the years when in fact it has done the exact opposite.

AN INSPIRING STORY OF COURAGE

October 16, 2024
, , , Tales of Inspiration

By John McLean

On 10th September, 2024, the death occurred of Dale Collett, a hero of the Rhodesian Bush War and an inspiration for all those who suffer adversity in their lives.

Dale was brought up on a farm in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. He learned Zulu from speaking with the farm’s African employees. After leaving school he went up to Rhodesia and joined its army which was engaged in deadly combat with two groups of terrorists, Mugabe’s ZANLA lot who were armed by China (an enemy of the West then as it is now) and Joshua Nkomo’s ZIPRA group which was armed mainly by the Soviet Union.

Because of his fluency in Zulu Dale was first placed with the Rhodesian African Rifles, a native regiment. His competence and bravery brought him to the notice of Major Ron Reid Daly who made him his first choice when choosing officers for his newly formed Selous Scouts which in quick time became the finest and most deadly anti-terrorist force that the world has ever seen. Of this choice Reid Daly later wrote, “He was reputed to have an extremely good rapport with his African soldiers….Dale was a young man of exceedingly high spirits”. 

The maiden deployment of the Selous Scouts was in January, 1974, in the Kandeya Tribal Trust lands, north of Mount Darwin. This was in the Hurricane Operational Area (north-east Rhodesia). On the night of 23-24 February Dale and his men were engaged in reconnaissance of a terrorist camp and at dawn he directed the Rhodesia Light Infantry Fireforce planes to the target with the result that six terrorists were killed and one captured plus weapons and documents, the latter with their maps, passwords, etc. being important since the terrorists were not using radio contact for security reasons.

Later in 1974 Dale was in command of troops who were to make a night raid on a small terrorist position. However, because of the terrain only he and two others were in a position to make an attack. With his trademark courage he pressed on under heavy fire and managed to clear it of terrorists, killing three of them and forcing the others to flee. By the end of 1974 his score was 29 dead terrorists and he was the first man to be awarded the Silver Cross of Rhodesia, the second highest award for gallantry in the Rhodesian Armed Services.

During an attack on terrorist positions over the border in Mozambique in 1976 Dale and the other Scouts came upon a building, the ground floor of which was an arms depot for ZANLA. It was a main store for weapons that were being smuggled into Rhodesia by the terrorists for their murder campaign against white farmers and black villagers.

The building and its environs seemed deserted. There was an upper floor to which the only access was by an outside staircase. While the Scouts were busy loading the weapons to take back over the border to Rhodesia Dale Collett mounted the staircase to the upper floor. Upon entering the first floor corridor there was a burst of enemy fire and he fell to the floor wounded. He slithered back to the top of the staircase where he was rescued by his comrades. 

Dale was flown to Salisbury’s Andrew Fleming Hospital where it was discovered that his spinal cord had been severed and he was told that he would never walk again. He was paralysed from the chest down.

When Major Reid Daly visited him there and asked him how he was feeling, Dale said in a soft voice, “Sir, don’t worry about me…..you’ve got bigger things to worry about. It’s the chaps in the bush you’ve got to concentrate on….I’ll be fine.”

In Reid Daly’s words: “It was all too much for me…..here was a man struck down in the prime of his youth comforting me, instead of the reverse. I stood up abruptly and with tears welling unashamedly from my eyes, I brushed past the lady who was later to become Mrs. Collett and left the ward. ‘Hell’, exclaimed Dale to that very fine woman, ‘what’s up with the old man….I only told him to get on with the war’.” Dale and his wife were married, their wedding photo showing a happy looking bridegroom proudly wearing his military uniform and decorations as he sat in his wheelchair.

The courage that Dale had consistently shown in the field was now transferred to his new life as a civilian where his determination and positive attitude enabled him to lead as normal a life as he could in the circumstances.

After moving to Botswana he built up his own farm and business, employing local people who were themselves disabled. He also gave motivational talks. After a number of years he was helping to renovate his house when a roof collapsed on him, requiring his leg to be amputated and injuring his shoulder which, despite several surgeries, never really recovered.

And did he feel sorry for himself and wallow in self-pity? Remaining positive, he got his motor bike fitted with a flat-bed and rode it from Gaborone in Botswana to Cape Town (1,548 km) to raise funds for the Ray of Hope Foundation in Gaborone, which takes care of terminally ill children. This ride raised over 100,000 Rand. At the time he said, “The big problem in life is that very few of us take the bull by the horns. Get on the bike and ride! Stop dreaming about it, just do it.”

Dale Collett was not only a brave soldier who risked his life on several occasions so that civilians in war-torn Rhodesia could sleep more safely at night but also his courage in the face of almost unbelievable adversity is an inspiration to us all. He was among the very finest of his generation. May he rest in peace.

WHEN WILL THE NAVY EVER LEARN?

October 15, 2024
, , , , , , Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

By John McLean, author of “A Mission of Honour; The Royal Navy in the Pacific, 1769-1997”.

In my article of a couple of days ago on the HMNZS Manawanui disaster, entitled “Is The Navy Fit For Purpose?”, I raised the issue of the perceived over-promotion of minority groups in the services at the expense of the efficiency of our defence forces.

Speculation is rife throughout the country as in both general conversation and on social media (usually a truer reflection of opinion than the mainstream media) the suspicion is that the captain of HMNZS Manawanui, Commander Yvonne Gray, was over-promoted because she ticked the boxes of being both female and lesbian.

Instead of facing this issue and providing some facts to rebut such a presumption the Navy has compounded the problem by appointing as chair of the Inquiry into the disaster yet another person who can only too easily be perceived to be another of its over-promoted women – in this case Commodore Melissa Ross, who also ticks the boxes that seem to be more and more important in naval promotions – in her case being both female and part-Maori.

So passionate is she about the importance of promoting women in the Navy (apparently because they are women rather than on merit) that the Navy website of 6 December, 2019, stated of her: “She is passionate about the development of women in the military and was co-chair of the N.Z. Defence Force’s Women’s Development Steering Group, which she helped create”. 

She gave away her prejudices in her own words: “With women in the Navy, we still have work to do to create the environment where they can thrive” (presumably at the expense of men). And yet the speaker of this sexist nonsense has been appointed by her fellow feminist, Judith Collins, to investigate the sinking of the Manawanui by another woman officer, Yvonne Gray whose ability to tick various boxes is widely believed to have been the reason for her rapid promotion to command of the $100 million vessel that, under her command, sank in Samoan waters.

How could anyone have faith in such an Inquiry, headed by one who appears to be so fanatically committed to her fellow female officers as to bring her objectivity into doubt? Commodore Ross is the very last person who should be involved in an inquiry into the sinking of the Manawanui. Much of the blame for this continuing “train crash” can be laid at the feet of Judith Collins who, as Minister of Defence, was responsible for appointing her fellow feminist, Melissa Ross, to head the inquiry.

Instead of trying to rebut the obvious presumption that Yvonne Gray might have been appointed to command due to her ability to tick certain boxes of political correctness that the Navy apparently now deems so essential to promotion, Judith Collins resorted to smear tactics, which are always easier than giving truthful answers to allegations. Those who dared to point out that the purpose of the Navy is to defend the country and that this can best be achieved by promotion on merit rather than gender/sexual orientation were damned by Collins as “misogynists” and “armchair admirals”.

The Inquiry seems to be organised so that the Navy can protect its own back as well as its policies, including – and especially – the criteria for promotion in this ever more feminine (and feminist) service. As Peter Cresswell pointed out on his Not PC Blog (pc.blogspot.com) “An inquiry by the Navy about the Navy doesn’t give confidence that we’ll ever know much more”.

The New Zealand Navy is a small affair where everybody knows everybody else and that is especially true of the coterie of powerful female officers who all seem to be of the same stripe – of advancing women (and covering up for them?) at the expense of men. Obviously Melissa Ross and Yvonne Gray know each other – probably very well. If a litigant in court is known to the judge, that is always pointed out and the judge will normally remove himself from the case. So why not follow this rule for the naval Inquiry?

For an Inquiry to be credible in should be headed by the Judge Advocate of the Armed Forces with two others: one from Britain’s Royal Navy and the other from the Royal Australian Navy. Only then could the public, whose taxes have to pay for a $130 million replacement vessel, have confidence in the outcome of the Inquiry. The choice of Melissa Ross to head it is yet another example of Judith Collins’ notoriously bad judgement. Former Defence Minister, Ron Mark, would never have made such a blunder.

Not surprisingly, the continuing absence of any meaningful information from the Navy has fuelled the rumour mill. One of these rumours is that Yvonne Gray’s “wife”, Sharon, was also on board the Manawanui when she sank. This is either true or false; it would be helpful if the Navy (or its Minister) would either confirm or deny it. As the well-paid Minister of Defence, Judith Collins has a lot of questions to answer and merely smearing those who ask them is not good enough. This thing is becoming a bigger mess by the day.

1 2 3 … 9
Copyright © 2023 Tross Publishing. All rights reserved.