VACCINATION MANIA = CHILD ABUSE

Ron Asher

Just as the neo-Marxist Department of Education, aided and abetted by the Teachers’ Union, has been responsible for the dramatic fall in educational standards in recent years so too has the incompetent and deceitful Department of Health been responsible for a worsening of the nation’s health. A Department that promotes potentially dangerous vaccines and lies about their safety cannot be trusted to tell the truth on these or other matters.

Like virtually all the Health Departments in the world New Zealand’s has been captured by Big Pharma, which pushes its various money-making drugs on to the population using the health bureaucrats as its “useful idiots”. Big Pharma, consisting of an oligarchy of huge, multi-national and often criminal companies, is one of the greatest threats facing mankind.

Take the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, for example. This vaccine is produced by Merck Sharp and Dohme, which in 2011 agreed to pay a fine of US$900 million for selling the painkiller Vioxx for four years, leaving behind a trail of patients with heart seizures and strokes. The following year it had to pay a US$328 million fine on criminal charges in the United States in respect of its aggressive marketing of unsafe drugs. And yet this is the company that the New Zealand Department of Health teamed up with to push Gardasil on to 12 year old girls. Thus did this company become the main partner in the N.Z. Health Department’s cervical cancer (HPV) campaign. This injecting of Gardasil into the arms of schoolgirls can lead to dire consequences such as infertility, mercury poisoning leading to shaking and uncontrollable coughing, and an inability to walk.

In the words of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, “This HPV vaccine costs hundreds of dollars [each dose] for something that most of the recipients do not even need protection against….The disease it supposedly protects against is not even contagious in the school environment.” 1

Gardasil is unnecessary for twelve year olds since cervical cancer is something that, if one was to contract it, it would be in the later years of life. According to the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics report on Gardasil, “To date clinical trial evidence has not demonstrated that Gardasil can actually prevent cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer deaths) because the follow-up period (5 years) was too short while cervical cancer takes 20 to 40 years to develop”. 2

In other words, they are promoting a vaccine to 12 year olds that is effective for only about 5 years and these girls are unlikely to get cervical cancer (if at all) until they are decades older. However, this does not matter to the Department since the main purpose of Gardasil seems to be to boost the profits of Merck, Sharp and Dohme rather than to be effective in combatting cervical cancer.

Despite this dodgy and potentially harmful drug failing to meet a single one of the four criteria required by the American FDA for Fast Track Approval (which it received) Gardasil is “demonstrably neither safer nor more effective than the Pap screening combined with LEEP, nor can it improve the diagnosis of serious cervical cancer outcomes”, wrote Canadian research scientists, Doctors Lucija Tomlejenovic and Christopher Shaw. 3

Several of these young girls, who should be in the prime of life, have died after being vaccinated with Gardasil while others have suffered serious disabilities. No responsible parent should ever let their daughter (or son as they are now pushing it on to boys) anywhere near a Gardasil needle.

And yet New Zealand’s Ministry of Health continues to promote it, with one of its spokespeople boasting “We’d just like to encourage young women that [not “who”] are listening to this to please go [split infinitive] and have your Gardasil injection, because you will protect yourself for the rest of your life”. 4 This piece of nonsense was uttered by the Ministry’s Doctor Api Talemaitoga, whose ignorance of grammar seems to match his apparent ignorance of the effects of Gardasil as there is no evidence that it protects an injected girl from cervical cancer for the rest of her life. This is nothing more than non-science based propaganda to sing the praises and boost the profits of Big Pharma.

Over the last two generations Big Pharma has pushed its drugs more and more on to the population, starting with tiny babies. In fact, its drug pushing starts even before a baby is born as FREE injections are pushed by the Department on to pregnant mothers; these include flu injections, Covid injections and one for a “combo” of tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

Then, when the little baby is 6 weeks old its tiny and fragile body is subjected to a “rotavirus” oral vaccine given as liquid drops in the mouth (allegedly to combat diarrhoea), plus the first jab for pneumococcal (allegedly for pneumonia, and ear and sinus infections) and the first of three vaccinations for the combo of tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough. Plus jabs for polio, Hepatitis B and Hib (a type of flu). And all this at only six weeks old whereas a couple of generations ago none of these were deemed to be necessary in children so young. They have suddenly become “necessary” by the marketing departments of Big Pharma and the gullibility of health bureaucrats.

Then at three months the poor little mites are brought back for a second dose of rotavirus, the first jab for meningococcal B, and the second lot of: tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough, polio, Hepatitis B and Hib.

They push the Hepatitis B jab on to kids even where the mother tests negative for this disease and there is no plausible risk to the child since the primary routes of transmission are intravenous drug use and sexual activity. Prior to the introduction of this vaccine the risk of a baby dying from Hepatitis B was one in 7 million. 5 Using the total number of live births in New Zealand in 2024 (58,341) as the guide, this amounts to only one death from Hepatitis B in a baby in a total of 120 years!!! So, all these babies are being vaccinated against Hepatitis B to save one life in 120 years. There is no other explanation for this unnecessary vaccination and the corruption of science that it involves other than the hold that the multi-national companies of Big Pharma have over New Zealand’s little Department of Health.

And is this the end of pumping all these questionable substances into the arms and feet of the infants? Of course not. Two months later (at 5 months old) comes another torrent of jabs – the second of pneumococcal, the second of meningococcal, and the third of diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, polio, Hepatitis B and Hib.

A few months later they are jabbed for flu and then as a year old their birthday treat is the horror of more needles, this time the final shot for pneumococcal and the first shot for measles, mumps and rubella.

Three months later the needles come again to pump in a booster shot for Hib, a jab for chicken pox, and the second lot for measles, mumps and rubella. Then at four years old they get boosters for diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus and polio.

So, is all this over-medicating of infants, that was not done two or three generations ago, resulting in a healthier population? Not at all as one in four New Zealanders now have chronic diseases (cancer, heart disease, strokes, diabetes and obesity) – a much higher rate (and rising) than before these vaccinations became so “necessary”.

According to the C.D.C. in the United States 76.4% of Americans now have a chronic disease whereas in 1961 it was 11% and in 1950 a mere 3%. Hardly surprising in view of this new cocktail of drugs all working against each other inside one’s body. In America a child has had 18 jabs by age 18 months and 76 jabs by age 18, certain jabs being mandatory in order to attend school in various states. And the result? A massive increase in autism. In 1970, fewer than one in 10,000 children in America had autism whereas now it is one in 33. If there is any better explanation for this rise in autism throughout the Western world than the over-medicating of children through vaccinations and the addition of fluoride and other questionable substances to the water supply, then it is yet to reveal itself.

The truth is that the vaccinated population is far more prone to chronic illness than people who have not had their bodies exposed to vaccines and whose natural immunity makes them for the most part resistant to the diseases that the vaccines are alleged by Big Pharma to combat.

When the Covid hysteria was unleashed children were once again targeted by Big Pharma and its puppets in the Health Department even though the incidence of Covid in children was so low that they were less likely to get it than the normal flu, thus showing that there was no need to vaccinate them. Among those who opposed vaccinating children against Covid was Doctor Ben Carson, paediatric surgeon at the prestigious John Hopkins Hospital at Baltimore, Maryland, since the risk of them contracting Covid was .025% – the same for seasonal flu for which children are not vaccinated en masse. However, that was not part of the plan of Jacinda Ardern, who set herself up as everybody’s cruel stepmother.

In the words of Doctor Rene de Monchy, a Tauranga G.P., “This is not so much about health but more about politics, money, power and social manipulation….What closed the door for me was when the vaccines were also given to children, who are absolutely not at risk from corona infection…..The immune system, especially of a child, is a delicate interplay. It is like a symphony orchestra with several sections: the winds, strings and percussion, all of which must fill in at just the right time. By administering vaccinations whose effects are still largely unknown, you are going to disrupt this interplay.” 6

Doctor de Monchy’s concerns were shared by other doctors, including Doctor Matt Shelton of Plimmerton, who at a news conference on 15 November, 2021, deplored using this experimental vaccine with unknown long-term effects on children whose lives are ahead of them. He claimed that there are likely to be greater problems for children from the jab since in its rushed trials for the vaccine Pfizer had nowhere near enough children to produce any meaningful findings.

In the words of Doctor Robert Malone, “Physical damage to children from injecting them with genetic vaccines in order to protect the elderly from a virus is occurring….The vaccines do not protect our children from becoming infected with Omicron, and do not protect infected children from infecting others. These [genetic vaccines] may damage their [children’s] brain, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.” 7

And a report from scientists in the United States and Europe concluded that the risks related to vaccines outweigh any potential benefits for children. “The bulk of the attributed Covid-19 deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities [having two or more diseases simultaneously], and the Covid-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children”. 8  So why subject an innocent child to a life of unknown risks?

According to an FDA of America Fact Sheet some 86% of 12 to 15 year olds suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccine in a clinical trial involving, 1,097 children who had had two jabs, plus another 30 who had had only one jab. The adverse reactions ranged from “mild” to “serious” and included fever, fatigue, headaches, chills, vomiting and diarrhoea. Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) data showed a 47% rise in all causes of deaths among teenagers (15 to 19) since the vaccination of this group commenced compared with the same period the year before.

In January, 2022, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health unrolled a vaccination push to jab the Covid vaccine needle into the arms of children 5 to 11 years old. This was in spite of the current advice from the World Health Organisation on its website: “There are currently no efficacy or safety data for children below the age of twelve years. Until such data are available individuals below twelve years of age should not be routinely vaccinated”.

So why did Ashley Bloomfield, head of the Health Department, defy this advice? The Ministry claimed that it took its advice from its partner, Pfizer, which had a financial incentive to inject as many people as possible regardless of the consequences. How could anybody believe anything that Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world, said for, like Merck, Sharp and Dohme (the Ministry’s partner in its Gardasil campaign), Pfizer, (its partner for Covid) is also a very shady company.

In 2009 Pfizer and its subsidiary company agreed to pay US$2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil liability arising out of the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products. This was the largest health care fraud settlement in American history. 9  At the same time in Nigeria Pfizer was sued by both the Nigerian federal and state authorities for harming African children with a trial of a new anti-biotic, Trovan. In 2009 Pfizer settled with the authorities for US$75 million and paid compensation to the families of those children who died.

As a willing and apparently uncritical accomplice of Big Pharma New Zealand’s Department of Health is barely worthy of belief in respect of anything that it puts on its website in relation to vaccinations. Until we have a government courageous and honest enough to straighten out this sinister combination of Big Pharma and health bureaucrats the safest thing for parents would appear to be to ignore the Department’s self-serving vaccination programmes and decide for themselves which vaccines (if any) should be given to their little ones. That way the children of New Zealand are less likely to have their bodies abused by ruthless, self-serving, money grubbing pharmaceutical companies and their docile handmaidens in the Ministry of Health injecting a cocktail of largely unnecessary drugs into their tiny bodies. Prescribing endless drugs while ignoring the root causes of diseases will do nothing to reduce disease among children but it will boost the profits of Big Pharma, which seems to be the whole purpose of this dangerous exercise. Natural immunity is usually better at combatting these diseases than endless vaccinations.

Ron Asher is the author of “A Jab in the Dark; Covid Vaccines and the new Health Dictatorship” (ISBN 9781872970 813), 190 pages, Price: $35 (incl. Postage within NZ). Available through www.trosspublishing.com or E-mail: trosspub@gmail.com

References:

  1. Totalitaria, Ian Wishart. P. 71-2
  2. Ibid P. 73
  3. Ibid P. 71-2
  4. Ibid, P. 73
  5. Secretary of Health Robt Kennedy’s evidence to Congress, Sept. 2025
  6. RAIR Foundation, 22 Dec. 2021
  7. open letter to Canadian truckers, 10 Feb. 2022
  8. Daily Expose 28 Sept. 2021
  9. US Dept of Justice 2 Sept. 2009

A TOXIC INFLUENCE IN NEW ZEALAND SCHOOLS

New Zealand schools are compelled to “consult with iwi”. This involves “undertaking and respecting iwi’s perspectives on education, cultural values and aspirations for their children. Consultation should be ongoing and genuine, with schools ACTIVELY seeking input from iwi on curriculum, school activities and any initiatives that impact [part] Maori students”. (The term “part-Maori” is used since “Maori” are extinct, having bred themselves out of existence by preferring to breed with Europeans).

The above requirement is racist, laughable and very damaging to the education of New Zealand school students. It is racist because it singles out one of New Zealand’s several minority race groups, part-Maoris, but no others. It is laughable to ask for “iwi’s perspectives on education” and to ACTIVELY seek “input from iwi on curriculum” because the part-Maoris on these iwi committees, who are being asked for this input, are the very worst group of New Zealanders to give such advice since part-Maoris are at the very bottom of every educational statistic, topping the statistics for truancy but being consistently at the bottom of educational achievement.

Instead of dealing with the very real problem of truancy and poor literacy among part-Maoris, these iwi consultative groups are in the business of a cultural crusade against Western values, Western education and even nomenclature. They are like cultural doorkeepers, forcing changes to any notice or sign in the school that is in English only, weeding out any books from the school library that mention cannibalism or any of the other ugly traditional Maori practices, and even using their clout to change the name of any school that offend the prejudices of the tribal elite. Their contribution to the sound education of the general body of students in precisely zero, which is why a tried and tested discipline like Latin has been expunged while the new, largely made-up, Esperanto type “te reo” is given an almost godly status even though in the 21st century it is all but useless. Learning French or Mandarin would be far more use to students – both “part-Maori” and non-Maori.

A recent outrage of these cultural warriors has been to change the name of James Cook High School in Manurewa, Auckland. The school was founded in 1968 on the eve of the Bicentenary of Captain Cook’s great First Voyage of discovery in the Endeavour. It was on this voyage that he mapped New Zealand and made it known to the world. This was the first step in bringing the Stone Age tribes of New Zealand into the safety, freedom, peace, comfort and prosperity of the modern world and away from their centuries of self-destructive tribal wars and cannibalism.

For 57 years this school has built up a name for itself and a culture that has been a source of pride to its students. Its motto is “Endeavour” – a nod to Cook and a suitable word to encourage the students. However, it has recently got up the nose of the local iwi who have forced their will on to the school and compelled it to change its name to the unpronounceable and meaningless “Te Haikura a Kiwa”. No, I am not making this up. You have Auckland Grammar, Kings, Rangitoto College – and now something with four words that nobody understands either now or in the future.

The principal, Tina Filipe, is either too gutless to stand up against this act of cultural vandalism, destroying 57 years of a built-up tradition, or – even worse – she is a collaborator in this act of cultural destruction. In either event it would appear that she is quite unfit to be running a secondary school.

On her watch this school has a low Equity Index of 532, “placing it amongst schools whose students have the most socioeconomic barriers to achievement (roughly equivalent to  deciles 1 and 2 under the previous system)”. In other words, its educational achievement is one of the lowest in the country.

One would have thought that the principal of such a school would devote all of her time and effort into lifting the educational standards of this failing school instead of playing race politics and denigrating our wonderful Western heritage by going to all the trouble of changing the name of a school after it has been going for more than half a century under the name of James Cook High School. Of course, by going down the name-changing path, Tina Filipe will be diverting attention towards an extraneous matter and away from the appalling educational standards of the school that she is meant to be running. That may well be the whole point of the exercise. What sort of parents would condemn their children to be educated at such a school?

Book Review: The Pioneers – Makers of New Zealand

By Mike Butler on Breaking Views

Don’t forget the old pioneers

The Pioneers – Makers of New Zealand, a new book by writer-publisher John McLean, reminds us of those who built New Zealand, tells how, and explains why their contribution should not be forgotten.

McLean descends from an unusual pioneering family of Scots who did a double migration, first to Nova Scotia in 1793, and then on to Waipu, in Bream Bay, Northland, in 1854.

The people behind contractors John McLean and Sons also descended from this group. This company built bridges, railways, most of Wellington’s wharves, the entire Auckland electric tramway system, as well as the early stages of the Otira Tunnel under the southern Alps, starting in 1907.

This is the third book in a trilogy that McLean has written about the New Zealand pioneers, the others being Voyages of the Pioneers to New Zealand 1839-85, and Sweat and Toil, the Building of New Zealand.

Direct quotes from pioneers bring to life his latest story of those early days, when men, sometimes couples, travelled all the way from England, Scotland, or Ireland, to get in on the ground floor of a new colony.

Attracted by the lure of wealth, cheap land that they could own, the safety of British law, and the familiarity of British culture, they, often unexpectedly, found themselves faced with the daunting task of having to clear dense native bush before they could build shelter, let along plant anything.

Sometimes the forest was so dense there was not even enough room to swing an axe.

Without government welfare, and without money to make the long trip home, mostly to nothing, most pioneers had no option but to do keep going until the hut was built and the farm planted.

In a nutshell, “no other option but carry on” is the pioneering spirit.

That early energy and determination began to fade in the children of the pioneers, at the turn of the century, prompting Lord Ranfurly to say, in 1904, that “the people of the colony were growing too fond of going to the government for everything and were raising children that were unfitted for a pioneering life”.

“The king hit to the pioneering qualities of enterprise, hard work and self-reliance came with the introduction of the welfare state by the first Labour government which took office in 1935,“ Mclean wrote.

His close look at reactions to arrival in a new land, their houses, food, cooking, drink, clothes, transport, religion, social and sporting activities, their effect on the environment, and the origin of the towns, among numerous other chapter headings, sheds light on the culture that the descendants of British early settlers have that seems invisible but which is omnipresent.

For instance, the habit of a Sunday roast that came with the pioneers had become a feature of life in Britain as the main meal of the week that was slow cooked while the family went to church, ready to be eaten when they returned home.

The forebears of the sparrows on your lawn were introduced to counter voracious caterpillars that invaded from the virgin bush to eat every blade of new sown grass.

Whiskey, beer and cigarettes, racing, cricket, rugby all came with the pioneers.

McLean shows that relations between pioneers and Maoris were mainly of mutual benefit, except for when some tribes rebelled in some areas in the 1840s and 1860s.

The military response to those rebellions led to the creation of military towns including Hamilton, Cambridge, Pirongia, and Kihikihi, numerous redoubts (settler forts) signposted as historical reminders, as well as extensive land confiscations in parts of the North Island as a consequence of insurrection.

McLean’s easy-to read third book on the New Zealand pioneers will rekindle in those of us with forebears who came here early a renewed understanding and respect that may have been sidelined as unacceptable, or which may have just drifted away with the passage of time.

The Pioneers – Makers of New Zealand, John McLean, Winter Productions, 256 pages, illustrated, is available from independent bookshops or www.trosspublishing.com

1 2 3