education Archives -

New Zealand schools are compelled to “consult with iwi”. This involves “undertaking and respecting iwi’s perspectives on education, cultural values and aspirations for their children. Consultation should be ongoing and genuine, with schools ACTIVELY seeking input from iwi on curriculum, school activities and any initiatives that impact [part] Maori students”. (The term “part-Maori” is used since “Maori” are extinct, having bred themselves out of existence by preferring to breed with Europeans).

The above requirement is racist, laughable and very damaging to the education of New Zealand school students. It is racist because it singles out one of New Zealand’s several minority race groups, part-Maoris, but no others. It is laughable to ask for “iwi’s perspectives on education” and to ACTIVELY seek “input from iwi on curriculum” because the part-Maoris on these iwi committees, who are being asked for this input, are the very worst group of New Zealanders to give such advice since part-Maoris are at the very bottom of every educational statistic, topping the statistics for truancy but being consistently at the bottom of educational achievement.

Instead of dealing with the very real problem of truancy and poor literacy among part-Maoris, these iwi consultative groups are in the business of a cultural crusade against Western values, Western education and even nomenclature. They are like cultural doorkeepers, forcing changes to any notice or sign in the school that is in English only, weeding out any books from the school library that mention cannibalism or any of the other ugly traditional Maori practices, and even using their clout to change the name of any school that offend the prejudices of the tribal elite. Their contribution to the sound education of the general body of students in precisely zero, which is why a tried and tested discipline like Latin has been expunged while the new, largely made-up, Esperanto type “te reo” is given an almost godly status even though in the 21st century it is all but useless. Learning French or Mandarin would be far more use to students – both “part-Maori” and non-Maori.

A recent outrage of these cultural warriors has been to change the name of James Cook High School in Manurewa, Auckland. The school was founded in 1968 on the eve of the Bicentenary of Captain Cook’s great First Voyage of discovery in the Endeavour. It was on this voyage that he mapped New Zealand and made it known to the world. This was the first step in bringing the Stone Age tribes of New Zealand into the safety, freedom, peace, comfort and prosperity of the modern world and away from their centuries of self-destructive tribal wars and cannibalism.

For 57 years this school has built up a name for itself and a culture that has been a source of pride to its students. Its motto is “Endeavour” – a nod to Cook and a suitable word to encourage the students. However, it has recently got up the nose of the local iwi who have forced their will on to the school and compelled it to change its name to the unpronounceable and meaningless “Te Haikura a Kiwa”. No, I am not making this up. You have Auckland Grammar, Kings, Rangitoto College – and now something with four words that nobody understands either now or in the future.

The principal, Tina Filipe, is either too gutless to stand up against this act of cultural vandalism, destroying 57 years of a built-up tradition, or – even worse – she is a collaborator in this act of cultural destruction. In either event it would appear that she is quite unfit to be running a secondary school.

On her watch this school has a low Equity Index of 532, “placing it amongst schools whose students have the most socioeconomic barriers to achievement (roughly equivalent to deciles 1 and 2 under the previous system)”. In other words, its educational achievement is one of the lowest in the country.

One would have thought that the principal of such a school would devote all of her time and effort into lifting the educational standards of this failing school instead of playing race politics and denigrating our wonderful Western heritage by going to all the trouble of changing the name of a school after it has been going for more than half a century under the name of James Cook High School. Of course, by going down the name-changing path, Tina Filipe will be diverting attention towards an extraneous matter and away from the appalling educational standards of the school that she is meant to be running. That may well be the whole point of the exercise. What sort of parents would condemn their children to be educated at such a school?

The tests of opinion on 14^th October – the General Election in New Zealand and the “Voice” referendum in Australia – showed a serious disconnect between the political/media establishment and the bulk of the people.

Right across New Zealand there was a movement to “Blue” by which I mean National, ACT and NZ First. But not in Wellington where the Bureaucracy resides. There the trend went the other way. Labour retained all its seats in the Wellington area except Hutt South, which went to National, and Wellington Central and Rongotai which went to the even more extreme Left Wing Greens.

Compare this with Auckland where there was an almost complete wipeout of Labour, with only four seats Red and sixteen seats Blue. This, of course, was largely the result of Jacinda Ardern’s totally unnecessary, economically disastrous and emotionally draining lockdown of New Zealand’s biggest city for 107 days in 2021 on the basis of one – yes, a single one – case of Covid. Not that the mainstream media, beholden to Ardern and Labour for so much of their funding, would ever admit that it was the lockdown that was largely responsible for driving Auckland “Blue”.

The result of all this is that Wellington, headquarters of bureaucratic control of New Zealand, has become completely out of step with the rest of the country. The danger here is that, despite the Election result, these power crazy civil servants will continue to expand their power over the lives of the citizens. This would undo the result of the Election unless the incoming Blue government takes a very serious stand with its civil servants, sacking those who are seen to be impeding the clearly expressed democratic will of the people. A good start in any wholesale dismissals would be all the neo-Marxists at the top of the Education Department who are more interested in indoctrinating school students than educating them – as has been documented by Roger Childs in his book, The New Zealand History Curriculum; Education or Indoctrination, available from Tross Publishing.

In Australia the political/media establishment tried to pull a fast one over the people by initiating a referendum to give those Australians with any Aborigine blood in them (about 3% of the population) a special “Voice” in government that would have been unavailable to others. Like all Australians, Aborigines already have a voice which can be expressed by such things as voting at election time, approaching their M.P. at Saturday morning “surgeries”, and making submissions to Select Committees of Parliament – all part and parcel of accountable democracy.

The essence of the “Voice” was to establish an Australian version of New Zealand’s Waitangi Tribunal, which would make endless recommendations to government so as to skew legislation the way of advancing this tiny group which, by definition, means disadvantaging all other Australians. It appealed to Canberra’s political elite as a way of moving away from open and accountable democracy towards the secret meetings behind closed doors which have become so much a feature of Treaty settlements in New Zealand, especially on the watch of National’s Treaty Minister, Christopher Finlayson, who seemed to prefer this method of governing rather than traditional democracy for which this List M.P. seemed to have an unnatural contempt – apparently because every time that he stood for Parliament in either Mana or Rongotai he was heavily defeated by voters even though in Rongotai they gave their party vote to National but couldn’t stomach the candidate.

The Voice referendum cost the Australian taxpayer A$400 million at a time when many people are having difficulty paying their bills and taxes. The “Yes” campaign to give Aborigines a special “voice” was directed by the political/media elite in Canberra and was supported by all sorts of virtue signallers from the Catholic Church to Woke corporates. It spent five times as much money on promoting its cause than the “No” campaign, which had a broader leadership that included Aborigines such as Senator Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine. These and other Aborigine supporters of the No campaign knew that the Voice was all about enriching and empowering the current Aborigine tribal elite rather than giving genuine help to Aborigines who might need it.

Sports stars and big companies used their profiles and power to urge Australians to vote “Yes” with Qantas, under the palsied leadership of Alan Joyce, being in the lead – even wasting its shareholders’ money in painting planes with “Yes” in big lettering. Local authorities draped “Yes” flags in their main streets and in a new variety of child abuse schoolchildren were given “Yes” badges to wear to school. In other words the whole Establishment was on side to tell Australians to vote “Yes” to this radical new undermining of both democracy and the principle of One Law For All.

So, what happened? Well, in all six states there was a majority of “No” votes, the average across the continent being 60% No and 40% Yes. The “little people” showed that they would make up their own minds rather than be told what to do by the Establishment. This was the first plebiscite on the new phenomenon of identity politics and the people of Australia showed that they didn’t want a bar of it. Better to keep Australia the way it is than to break it up on racial lines.

However, in Canberra the vote went the other way: 65% “Yes”. Since the Australian Capital Territory of Canberra is not a state this does not negate the earlier statement that all six states voted “No”. What it does show is that – as with Wellington going Red/Green when the rest of New Zealand went “Blue” – the civil servants and media wonks are at variance with the rest of the nation. So, how did they take the result? Oh, the vote was due to “misinformation” and “racism” by the No side. How naughty of the people not to do what they were told!

We need to be aware of just how removed this wretched political/media elite is from the rest of the country and be very wary of anything that comes out of their mouths. Their interest in upholding our hard-won democracy is not as strong as it is among the rest of the country. As the results on 14^th October showed, “Canberra” and “Wellington” are fast becoming dirty words in the lexicon of democracy.

A Wellingtonian.

A TOXIC INFLUENCE IN NEW ZEALAND SCHOOLS

A SERIOUS DISCONNECT