So Maori Claim to be Genetically Superior

March 14, 2026
, , , , Maori, Te Pati Maori

By William Chambers

The ironic claim by Te Pati Maori of genetic superiority in those of Māori lineage showed through when, in an interview on the National Radio Programme, a part-Maori woman was asked whether she would be happy for her children to marry Pakeha.  This self-opinionated woman replied that it would certainly not be acceptable, because Maori bloodlines need to be kept pure!

Can you imagine if, in the same context, a Pakeha had said that on radio.  All hell would have broken loose.

 

The question that should be asked regarding the racist claim of genetic superiority is: “In what way”.  The fact being, IF Maori were superior in the way of intelligence and business acumen, then they wouldn’t need hand-outs or hand-ups.

Of course, Maori will explain away their failings by playing the blame card, i.e. there aren’t opportunities for them to succeed, because due to colonisation, they are a dispossessed and oppressed race.

And on top of that, face ‘discrimination’.

But hang on, how come other races of people such as Asians, Indians, Filipinos, and black Africans etc. who come to this country with nothing, manage to do very well for themselves.

The truth is, they succeed (achieve “EQUITABLE” outcomes) through work ethic and self-discipline.  Without being granted preferential “rights”.  Nor exploiting Welfare and/or resorting to crime.

And because they are not blighted with an “attitude” problem, it doesn’t enter their heads that they’re discriminated against.  They’re too busy leading decent lives and setting high standards for themselves and their children to exhibit a ‘grievance’ mentality anyway.

 

Therefore, we should not be blamed (or feel guilty) about any Maori failure … which can be due to lack of personal responsibility.

The fact is, offering help based exclusively on race is apartheid, i.e. unlawful.  And, is totally unjustified because what the Treaty guaranteed is equality of citizenship.

Which ironically means it is non-Maori who should feel aggrieved, due to being unfairly burdened with the cost of supporting people who, in many instances, expect it … in the sense of taking the easy way.

Besides which, the more support you offer one category of people, the more reliant they become to being carried through life.  That’s not good for any society.

 

TALKING ABOUT SUPERIORITY … if Maori were superior regarding CAPABILITY, then why would so many rely on Welfare?

Well, laziness isn’t a modern phenomenon, because as stated in Ian Wishart’s book ‘THE GREAT DIVIDE’ a Chief known as Ihakara Tokonui was brutally honest about this trait evident in Maori, when he admitted, quote: “You know what the bee is.  Some bees work, some bees are lazy.  The Pakeha are like the working bee.  But the Maori is like the other bee … the lazy one.  And Maori take advantage of the Pakeha’s work.”

 

THEN, if Maori were superior as regards being HONEST, why would they make up around 51% of the prison population, even though they’re only 18% of the total population.

The irony is that some Maori (and woke “snowflakes”) blame this also on the perceived effect of colonisation.

So, they’re saying that when Europeans first arrived, Maori were honest people.  Well, recorded history tells otherwise.  For example, in ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS: The Story of Marianne Williams’ by Caroline Fitzgerald, there is a quote: “When some chiefs were challenged about their dishonourable behaviour they admitted it was true, and agreed they were bad people.”

 

ANOTHER matter is “CHARACTER” or lack of it.  If Maori were superior in this department, then why would so many Maori toddlers be abused and murdered, by their so-called caregivers.

Past history also tells very badly on them regarding character.  I’ll give another quote from the ‘LETTERS FROM THE BAY OF ISLANDS’ … “A chief called Rangi admitted that Maori generally just think to themselves … I will eat, I will fight, I will distress some poor people, and take their children for slaves.”

I will also quote an excerpt from Charles Darwin’s ‘JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE AROUND THE WORLD, 1831 – 1836.’  After leaving Tahiti, the HMS Beagle visited New Zealand, and Darwin’s description of Maori is thus: “Looking at Maoris, one naturally compares them with the Tahitians … both belonging to the same family of mankind.  The comparison, however, tells heavily against the Maoris.  In every respect, their CHARACTER is of a lower order.”

While being brutally honest about the subject of “character” I’ll quote a visiting British envoy who was sent to New South Wales in 1835.  His words were: “The Maori chiefs, as well as the Tribes to which they belong, have one and the same distinguishing features, of which rapacious, thieving, and greedy disposition is a principal one”.

NOTE: the word “rapacious” is defined in the Oxford dictionary as: “Wanting more than you have a right to”.

So nothing has changed.

 

Of course, Maori may claim to be genetically superior at sport … but they’re certainly not as good as their Polynesian cousins, especially Samoans and Tongans.

 

THE ONE, and only thing Maori might be able to come up with to justify any perceived superiority, is their so-called wisdom in the way of spirituality.  But that claim is based on nothing but the fact that, in an evolutionary sense, they are only minutes removed from a primitive, stone age existence.  So, they’re still clinging to hocus-pocus beliefs that defy logic or SCIENTIFIC scrutiny.  Which signals a sign of ignorance – not superior knowledge.

And any ‘special’ knowledge that Maori might imagine is unique to “indigenous” peoples, is just like the claim of them actually being indigenous … utter baloney.

 

CONCLUSION: the outrageous delusion of Maori superiority is not backed-up by reality.  But is a totally unwarranted put-down to all other races of people.  So, this claim must be called out for what it is … blatant racism.

 

Which is instigated by the few stirrers at the top trying to wear us down … by resorting to the tactic of using any, and every opportunity to gain the upper hand.

In other words, it‘s all about ultimate “control“.

And they‘re well on their way to achieving their goal.

THE SMEAR OF “ANTI_SEMITISM” 

March 2, 2026
, , , Bolshevik Revolution, Book Review

When Tross Publishing published its latest book, Who was behind the Bolshevik Revolution?, we expected criticism from the highly organised lobby that seeks to intimidate into silence any publication that shows any group of Jewish people in a bad light no matter how accurate such description might be. And, of course, the more powerful the book (and this is a very powerful and convincing book), the more intense the criticism and the mindless cries of “anti-Semitism”. What Tross Publishing did not expect was how unnecessarily nasty and utterly pathetic such criticism would be – and here we are talking of Peter Cresswell’s review of the book, which is more a diatribe of smear tactics than a review.

He vents his fury on virtually everyone who has ever said the slightest thing against Jewish activities, including people who are not even mentioned in the book and are therefore irrelevant to a review of it. In his very first paragraph the reviewer calls for the book to be “withdrawn” – i.e. BANNED. And this from someone like Mr. Cresswell who has always presented himself as an advocate of free speech – unless, of course, any book gets up his nose, in which he urges that it should not see the light of day.

His 24 page (A4) review of a book of only 98 pages is a case of overkill and suggests that he is working to an agenda. His lengthy review is mostly nit-picking about citations (is it the first edition of a book or the second?) and complaints that a quoted sentence should have included further citation from the same quoted book. Very hard going for any reader of the review.

He wrote in his review, “They [the Jews] were driven to it, says the author, because they were Jews”. The author never wrote that. On the contrary, the last paragraph of his Introduction to the book is: “In his 1922 book, entitled The Jews, Hilaire Belloc wrote: ‘Bolshevism is a Jewish movement but not a movement of the Jewish race as a whole’. It is important to keep this in mind when reading the book as the crimes of some members of a group cannot and must not be attributed to all of them”. Can’t be much clearer than that. This is an instance of the reviewer using misinformation as part of his smear campaign.

He then says that Lenin “was not at all Jewish”. If he had read the book, he would have known that Lenin was one quarter Jewish through his maternal grandfather whose parents, Alexander and Miriam Blank, were Yiddish speaking Ashkenazi Jews.

The reviewer claims that “Jews as a community suffered enormously under Soviet rule”. That came two decades after the Revolution and is not relevant to the events of 1917 and its immediate aftermath, which is the subject of the book.

Another of the reviewer’s strange and unsubstantiated claims is that there were only five Jews out of twenty-one on the Bolshevik Central Committee

The review claims that Hilaire Belloc rejected the idea of a “vast age-long plot [of the Jews] culminating  in the contemporary Russian affair”, and that this “contradicts Asher’s thesis”. Well, it doesn’t because Mr. Asher, the author of the book, neither wrote of nor implied and “vast age-long plot” or even anything like it.

Unable to help himself in his rage, the reviewer wrote of the “Recrudescence of Anti-Semitic feeling of which Mr. Asher’s book is an ongoing part” the usual standard smear of “anti-Semitism” and further misinformation. His barely concealed anger even resulted in him devoting two paragraphs in lashing out at Kerry Bolton, a writer who was neither mentioned nor cited in the book. Why this irrelevance?

However, Mr. Bolton was not alone in being the victim of the smear. In fact, virtually every person and authority quoted in the book has suffered the same fate. Some examples. Belloc – “the noted anti-Semite” (again, the standard smear), Denis Fahey – “a fascist, would-be theocrat”, a JU.S. Congressional report of 1919 headed “Bolshevism and Judaism” – “a dumping ground for everything anyone had ever heard about the topic”, the claim by Jacob Schiff’s grandson, John, that Jacob had given US$20 million to finance the Russian Revolution – “comes only from a 1949 gossip column”, and “the White Russian propaganda tradition into which Mr. Asher is trapped”. However, only one White Russian is quoted in the whole book and that is A, Stolypin, the son of the former Tsarist Minister, Pyotr (Peter) Stolypin.

The reviewer even damns Winston Churchill as an “old bluffer”. Churchill was the most widely acclaimed man of modern times and everyone of us owes our present freedom to his courage and leadership in 1940 when the British Empire stood alone against Nazism and, but for the leadership of Churchill and his government, things could so easily have gone wrong. This particular smear suggests that the reviewer is ignorant of the events of 1940 or is just plain ungrateful.

In the relevant newspaper article of 1920 Churchill, the best informed member of the British government on Bolshevism and events in Russia at the time, wrote: “With the notable exception of Lenin the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders”. The reviewer denies this, relying – wait for it! – on a 1922 party census from the Bolsheviks, who were always such notorious liars. “These figures”, claims the reviewer, “from the Bolsheviks’ own census, directly contradict Churchill’s ‘majority’ claim and every percentage figure Asher deploys”.

This is unbelievable as Mr. Asher’s figures are taken from informed observers in Russia at the time – people like Victor Marsden, the Saint Petersburg correspondent of Britain’s Morning Post newspaper, Robert Wilton, the London Times correspondent in Russia during the Revolution, Rev. George Simons, the Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Saint Petersburg, and Captain Montgomery Schuyler, the chief intelligence officer of the American Expeditionary Force based in Omsk, Russia. And yet the reviewer takes his figures from the most notorious machine of deceit that Europe had seen in many a long year. This alone destroys the credibility of the entire review.

Unable to help himself, the reviewer claims that Robert Wilton’s number of nine Jewish members out of twelve on the Central Executive Committee of the Bolshevik Party “is contradicted by Soviet records showing six Jewish members out of fifteen”. Ah yes, those honest Soviet authorities and that horrid Mr. Wilton.

In the next paragraph the reviewer claims that after the Bolsheviks took over, the preponderance of Jews in its government “quickly died”. So how does he explain the fact that by 1935 the Central Executive of the Third International, which ruled the Soviet Union, consisted of 58 men of whom 55 were Jews. (Their names are given on Pages 32 and 33 of Mr. Asher’s book). The other three, Stalin, S.S. Lobow and V.V. Ossinsky, were married to Jewesses.

The reviewer claims in respect of a paragraph quoting Alexander Solzhenitsyn in the Introduction to the book that “He [Solzhenitsyn] didn’t write it”. And neither he did. In the book the relevant quote is preceded by the words “In the words of Alexander Solzhenitsyn…” You see, like all human beings Solzhenitsyn had a mouth as well as a hand for writing. These words of Solzhenitsyn were quoted by David Duke in his book, The Secret Behind Communism, and were spoken to Duke by Solzhenitsyn during an interview in 2002.

The reviewer’s final smear is in respect of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which are neither mentioned in the book nor even been read by the author. But, says the reviewer, “one does wonder if our author may have a copy near his desk” – both an assumption (wrong) and a smear. As Socrates said, “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers”.

The  reason for the unnecessarily savage and brutal tone of the review is because the book, using facts, figures and observations of reputable witnesses of the time, is so conclusive in showing that the Bolshevik Revolution was largely – but not exclusively – the work of Jewish revolutionaries – 9 Jews out of 12 on the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, 17 Jews and 5 Gentiles on the Council of People’s Commissars (Sovnarkom) in 1918, 43 Jews and 18 Gentiles on the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (1918), 45 Jews and 5 Gentiles on the High Commissaries of the People (1919), 23 Jews and 13 Gentiles on the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission (the Cheka secret police) while of the 17 countries in which the Soviet Union had ambassadors in 1935-6, 14 were Jews. In the book names of all the members of these groups are given, together with their ethnicity. Why shouldn’t all this be known?

And next time the reviewer bangs on about the value of free speech he, who says that the book should be withdrawn, should be laughed off the stage. Why not let people read it themselves and form their own opinion? The best way for anyone to understand these important historical issues is to get a copy of the book and read it – especially Chapter 10 which contains quotes from 21 rabbis, Jewish writers and magazines actually boasting about the dominant Jewish role in Bolshevism at the time.

In the Jaws of the Dragon, by Ron Asher

CHINA – TYRANNY and BRUTALITY

February 25, 2026
, , , , China

In a fast changing world there is one thing that never seems to change and that is the brutality and tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party ever since it shot its way into power in 1949 and has remained a dictatorship to this day. Such a tyranny can never hold an election as it knows that it would be voted out of office. After all, people don’t usually vote for their oppressors.

Its latest outrage was the sentencing in Hong Kong of 78 year old Jimmy Lai to 20 years imprisonment on trumped up charges that he “endangered Hong Kong’s security by collaborating with foreign powers”. The real reason why he was charged and given such a long sentence was that his former newspaper in Hong Kong, the enormously popular Apple Daily, ran certain editorials and stories that were not to the liking of the post-1997 Hong Kong authorities – people who are nothing more than puppets of the brutes in Beijing.

Jimmy Lai was born in China but as a young man he escaped its tyranny for the free society of British ruled Hong Kong. Full of enterprise and energy he built up a business of clothes shops on the cutting edge of fashion. These were hugely successful and he then branched out into the media – not by buying an existing newspaper but by establishing his own, Apple Daily. Like Jimmy himself it was committed to free enterprise and free speech. Although generally supportive of British rule it nevertheless would criticise the authorities if it felt that it was necessary to do so. This was never a problem as free speech was part and parcel of British rule.

However, after Britain so foolishly and gutlessly handed Hong Kong over to the Communists in 1997, the new and insecure authorities took a dim view of any criticism from any newspaper and so they arrested Apple’s owner, Jimmy Lai, and seven of his editors and executives. All these were sentenced in February, 2026, to long terms of imprisonment.

This is only the latest manifestation of tyranny by China’s authorities and comes on the back of China’s shooting to order healthy prisoners so as to obtain their body parts for transplants to high-up Party officials, and the imprisonment of millions of people in prisons and labour camps. Many of these prisoners are used as unpaid slave labour in the factories where they produce consumer goods for export to the West, including New Zealand.

The prisons are built alongside factories in which the senior prison officials have a financial interest. This is especially so in the great export hub of Shenzhen and Guangzhou on the lower reaches of the Pearl River delta, reputedly the world’s largest export manufacturing centre. A prime purpose of prison in China is to provide free labour to factories. That is why there are more than two million people in China’s jails and work camps. For example, around the Dongguan Prison complex are built fifteen factories in which the prisoners provide free labour.

Prisoners who don’t produce their required daily quotas with their over-worked hands are subject to ritual beatings, torture and solitary confinement. “The [prison] boss is not just the director of a prison but the manager of a business”, explained the former China “justice” minister, Zhang Fusen. Both guards and managers have their salaries tied directly to the output of the prisoners, hence the brutality towards anyone who might not reach the daily quota.

Those New Zealand politicians, like Todd McLay, who are forever promoting trade with China and those businessmen who import all these things to Australia and New Zealand are contributing to one of the greatest crimes in history.

Westerners who buy Chinese goods are also collaborators in the crime of propping up the most murderous and exploitive regime on the planet. The bigwigs at Briscoes, the Warehouse, Walmart and other China dependent retailers would declare that their goods are not made by prison labour but, as the Sunday Star-Times reported on 30 June, 2013, “Such is the opacity and diversity of global supply chains to-day that establishing a clear link can be difficult”. In the words of New Zealander, Danny Cancian, who spent  some time in one of these wretched prisons, “Most of the companies wouldn’t even know where their products are made”.

One could go on and on but a Blog is inadequate to relate and explain the horrors of China and the absolute folly, if not treason, of successive New Zealand governments in making our economy more and more dependent on China by exporting to it ever greater amounts of agricultural products. After all, China is a country that threatens its neighbours, that violates trade and other international agreements, and uses torture as a normal part of arrest procedures. China is the only potential enemy that New Zealand has. So why trade with it in such a big way and buy its products so as to boost its capacity for military spending?

In addition to this Blog, Tross Publishing has just reissued an updated version of our book, “In the Jaws of the Dragon; How China is Taking Over New Zealand and Australia”. It has been updated to 2026. It gives a detailed and frightening picture of the pickle that our governments have got us into by making our economy so dependent on such a brutal and insecure country as China under its current and aggressive dictatorship. It also shows the lack of imagination and patriotism of New Zealand’s exporters and importers who have been too lazy to diversify into other markets.

This latest version of “In the Jaws of the Dragon” is 432 pages of text (plus 12 photo pages), and costs $35 (including postage within New Zealand). It can be obtained from independent bookshops or direct from the publisher: www.trosspublishing.com

1 2 3 4 … 18
Copyright © 2023 Tross Publishing. All rights reserved.